I doubt that 2 lesbians kissing would have bothered me that much, but who knows, I think this shit's funny, but to be honest seeing gays and lesbians kissing is pretty sickening.
Lesbian actress thrown off plane after kiss - Telegraph
Printable View
I doubt that 2 lesbians kissing would have bothered me that much, but who knows, I think this shit's funny, but to be honest seeing gays and lesbians kissing is pretty sickening.
Lesbian actress thrown off plane after kiss - Telegraph
If iwas running an airline and saw two lesbos kissing, id give them extra airmiles.. Two guys is a different story though. Those dudes are geting thrown the fuck out..shit is so repulsive.
From what I could gather the Lesbian actress and her partner were more or less "making out", which really has no place on a public flight. Who knows, some of the passengers may have had their kids with them, I know if I had a young daughter with me I wouldn't want her seeing that bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
I think what it all boils down to, is the lesbian actress trying to get attention, and shoving her sick/twisted lifestyle in everyone else's face.
Emile Griffith would really like this website!
Lesbian or straight, there is just no need for it. I hate public intimacy, keep it behind closed doors. It is vulgar behaviour.
Saw a couple of lesbians kissing on the bus a few weeks ago. As you can imagine (being on the bus) they were pig fucking rough, gay because no bloke would have um and made me feel sick.
That is all.
Yet another case of homosexual's whining, glad she got thrown off the plane, it's just disappointing that the pilot decided to land first.
I'm not happy about the homophobic comments in this thread.
People get banned/punished for derogatory comments all the time - racism, sexism..... homophobia? What's the difference?
CFH and Missy are gonna be all over this.
Right, especially when it's being done in public, simply to get attention or annoy/agitate other people. In this case I doubt that anything would have been said to the lesbian actress if it was a simple kiss, but apparently it went way beyond that or the airline wouldn't have landed the plane and escorted them off of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
I know you're saying this mostly in jest Fenster, but a lot of what gets passed off as "sexism", "racism" and "homophobia" really isn't. If for example someone is critical in anyway of gay marriage, fag hags, or fags & lesbians and their lifestyles, they get stereotyped as a "homophobe".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Hahahaha, I couldn't agree more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo
Agreed it is inappropriate which ever sexual orientation the people were. Should not even be newsworthy.
Mile High Club.
The club every one should join.
Mars-ax, I agree mate
It's ridiculous that people get labelled "homophobe" just because they find two women kissing sickening and welcome their death.
It's not homophobia to get annoyed by one particular lobby group always wanting special treatment and who choose to force themselves and their values on everybody else at all times.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
First off, homosexuality is not a state of being it is an action, the physical act of being sexually involved with somebody of the same sex. When they are not kissing and touching each other they are just people, the same as the rest of us. In other words sexual acts and kissing passionately are things you choose to engage in, they do not define you, any more than smoking defines someone, or breastfeeding a child defines someone.
This is in stark contrast to say, being black, or being disabled, or being pregnant. These are states that cannot be altered. They do reflect who that person is, in that someone cannot stop being pregnant on a plane or stop being black. However a woman could stop breastfeeding and two people of the same sex (or any sex for that matter) can stop making out in public, the same way somebody can stop smoking or a nudist can put some clothes on.
Therefore it has nothing to do with sexuality, homophobia or anything else. It's just an example of some self important wannabe actress with a grandiose view of herself and a chip on her shoulder who wants to play the homophobe card because what she was doing was unsuitable for a public place.
It's the same with those two weird guys who met in a pub and start making out just minutes after metting and continued to do so after being asked several times to stop. When they were made to leave, did they think it might be because of the way they were behaving? No, of course not, it must have homophobia and so they went to the newspapers and then the next days thousnads of fellow gay people with the same chip on their shoulder organise a kissathon outside the pub for the attention of the nation's media.
They are total assholes.
Nice bit of sarcasm there mate, however, you seem to miss the point entirely, loathing fags & lesbians for their unacceptable behavior and chosen lifestyle, does not make someone "homophobic".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by BilboIt's not homophobia to get annoyed by one particular lobby group always wanting special treatment and who choose to force themselves and their values on everybody else at all times.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
First off, homosexuality is not a state of being it is an action, the physical act of being sexually involved with somebody of the same sex. When they are not kissing and touching each other they are just people, the same as the rest of us. In other words sexual acts and kissing passionately are things you choose to engage in, they do not define you, any more than smoking defines someone, or breastfeeding a child defines someone.
This is in stark contrast to say, being black, or being disabled, or being pregnant. These are states that cannot be altered. They do reflect who that person is, in that someone cannot stop being pregnant on a plane or stop being black. However a woman could stop breastfeeding and two people of the same sex (or any sex for that matter) can stop making out in public, the same way somebody can stop smoking or a nudist can put some clothes on.
Therefore it has nothing to do with sexuality, homophobia or anything else. It's just an example of some self important wannabe actress with a grandiose view of herself and a chip on her shoulder who wants to play the homophobe card because what she was doing was unsuitable for a public place.
It's the same with those two weird guys who met in a pub and start making out just minutes after metting and continued to do so after being asked several times to stop. When they were made to leave, did they think it might be because of the way they were behaving? No, of course not, it must have homophobia and so they went to the newspapers and then the next days thousnads of fellow gay people with the same chip on their shoulder organise a kissathon outside the pub for the attention of the nation's media.
They are total assholes.
Well said, gay activists are fond of comparing their "struggle for equality" to that of blacks, which is utter bullshit and an insult to blacks.
Yes, they are psychopathic assholes, and sadly, their "mental illness", is primarily psychosomatic.
There is nothing wrong with homosexuals per se. They are just human beings who like a different gender and as long as they are doing their intimate things behind closed doors then nobody should have an issue with them. Gays should have the same rights as straight people and should even be allowed to marry. But I draw the line at kissing in public and apply the same logic to all human beings.
How about in movies?Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
People choose to watch a film and generally have an idea of what to expect, but in all honesty I don't like intimacy in films either. It makes me uncomfortable. I love Hitchcock, but think he was a bit of a pervert with some of his overblown kissing scenes. I don't need to see Cary Grant kissing Ingrid Bergman for seven hours. If I was Hitchcock I would be telling them to shake hands and have a quick hug then get on with the next line.Quote:
Originally Posted by GhostHow about in movies?Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
Cary Grant probably never kissed anyone intimately on a plane and if he did I hope people would tell him to quit with that nonsense. I would be the wrong person to be sitting in the aisle with them, I would tell him to pack it in and get a room.
So who's up for some bum love?:kissasskc4::bananasex::fking:
Sorry bilbo I misunderstood
Death to anyone that indulges in the physical act of kissing in public. And death to anyone complaining about being thrown off a plane.
Nothing to do with homosexuality.
Hmmm.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mars_axNice bit of sarcasm there mate, however, you seem to miss the point entirely, loathing fags & lesbians for their unacceptable behavior and chosen lifestyle, does not make someone "homophobic".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
I sure have missed your point?
I cant be bothered to enter into an argument about this. But thats pretty much the definition of homophobic Mars.Quote:
Originally Posted by FensterHmmm.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mars_axNice bit of sarcasm there mate, however, you seem to miss the point entirely, loathing fags & lesbians for their unacceptable behavior and chosen lifestyle, does not make someone "homophobic".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
I sure have missed your point?
ho·mo·pho·bi·a (hhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/omacr.gifhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/lprime.gifmhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gif-fhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/omacr.gifhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gifbhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/emacr.gif-http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gif)
n. 1. Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
2. Behavior based on such a feeling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
This, when it's for something entirely their own fault.
Also, I don't actually wish death upon them, I just want some kind of ejection shute on a plane so that troublemakers can be disposed of without inconveniencing the rest of the passengers by requiring a forced landing.
If they survive the fall then fair play to them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_CI cant be bothered to enter into an argument about this. But thats pretty much the definition of homophobic Mars.Quote:
Originally Posted by FensterHmmm.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mars_axNice bit of sarcasm there mate, however, you seem to miss the point entirely, loathing fags & lesbians for their unacceptable behavior and chosen lifestyle, does not make someone "homophobic".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
I sure have missed your point?
ho·mo·pho·bi·a (hhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/omacr.gifhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/lprime.gifmhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gif-fhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/omacr.gifhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gifbhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/emacr.gif-http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gif)
n. 1. Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
2. Behavior based on such a feeling.
I'm familiar with most definitions for homophobic, J_C, typically it's either a phobia/fear of fags & lesbians or a fear that you may be one yourself. Most of the time however, it's used to belittle or insult someone who's critical of homos' and their chosen lifestyle. Examples of that are anyone who opposes gay marriage, or someone who teaches their children that the homosexual lifestyle is wrong and/or an unacceptable choice, they must therefore, be a homophobe.
So basically Fenster, other than sarcasm and cute little innuendos, you have nothing adult to contribute to this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by FensterHmmm.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mars_axNice bit of sarcasm there mate, however, you seem to miss the point entirely, loathing fags & lesbians for their unacceptable behavior and chosen lifestyle, does not make someone "homophobic".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
I sure have missed your point?
Threads like this make me dislike pretty much everyone on this site :p
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFH
Yep, it's probably best not to post threads discussing, gays or racism, it tends to ruffle feathers, or just be divisive and solve nothing. I have strong opinions about both topics, but I rarely make my true feelings known, some things are better left unsaid, but i'll say this, my thoughts/opinions are light-years away from being politically correct.
I agree and if claiming religion and one verse in an ancient text then I'd read on further to many verses that state :You either judge not or be judged by your own rod. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
:yay2::yay2::yay2::yay2::yay2::yay2::yay2::yay2:
yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
I mean where do you draw the line? Shagging in a public park? Might as well keep it all behind doors, holding hands should be the limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by pacmar3yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
Fuck me miles you have some very strange views on life, you come across like a 55yr old prude some times.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI mean where do you draw the line? Shagging in a public park? Might as well keep it all behind doors, holding hands should be the limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by pacmar3yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
Is it because you were never shown any attention or love as a child ?
Haha, that is quite possible. Typical unable to feel Brit. "I fought in a war you know, boy. But I shall never cry and I shall always refuse to kiss your mother. A man has his limits you know".Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyhitmanFuck me miles you have some very strange views on life, you come across like a 55yr old prude some times.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI mean where do you draw the line? Shagging in a public park? Might as well keep it all behind doors, holding hands should be the limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by pacmar3yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
Is it because you were never shown any attention or love as a child ?
haha, this is how i see you:Quote:
Originally Posted by milesHaha, that is quite possible. Typical unable to feel Brit. "I fought in a war you know, boy. But I shall never cry and I shall always refuse to kiss your mother. A man has his limits you know".Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyhitmanFuck me miles you have some very strange views on life, you come across like a 55yr old prude some times.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI mean where do you draw the line? Shagging in a public park? Might as well keep it all behind doors, holding hands should be the limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by pacmar3yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
Is it because you were never shown any attention or love as a child ?
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...FPEv_piFB_zx3g
Change = evolving further. Justification = fixed ideals.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesHaha, that is quite possible. Typical unable to feel Brit. "I fought in a war you know, boy. But I shall never cry and I shall always refuse to kiss your mother. A man has his limits you know".Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyhitmanFuck me miles you have some very strange views on life, you come across like a 55yr old prude some times.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI mean where do you draw the line? Shagging in a public park? Might as well keep it all behind doors, holding hands should be the limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by pacmar3yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
Is it because you were never shown any attention or love as a child ?
You have the power to except everything and cease judgments of the self and others. Anything, even sickness or stuck fast ways can be experienced as self imposed learning curves that have brought you to a point of decision to embrace change.
(if a thought exists in you, you allowed it to have as much power over your future as you so allow).
That gives you the power to break the mold or chains of upbringing and run off free from the past.
If we love others and forgive all others everything knowing full well that we could probably be similar to them if given their dna their IQ and their upbringing or social shaping,they too could be similar to us with all of ours.
That allows you to forgive all and you are then experiencing more a part of the all from within. The new price is loss of some ego because that is what keeps us experiencing life as separate (or better or worse than others.) Its a small door to future freedom, but all of our egos are sneaky in all of us though, its chatting to you already, telling you this is bullshit in order to protect its self from the real loving compassionate you that can squash the worse of it in a blink if you choose to. When you allow,then the friction is no longer there for dis ease to continue. Its the fight that the ego wants to continue cause when its over, its over and change takes place.
Well this is a bizarre response to give someone when he says he doesn't like to see two people tongue each other on a public plane.Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreChange = evolving further. Justification = fixed ideals.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesHaha, that is quite possible. Typical unable to feel Brit. "I fought in a war you know, boy. But I shall never cry and I shall always refuse to kiss your mother. A man has his limits you know".Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyhitmanFuck me miles you have some very strange views on life, you come across like a 55yr old prude some times.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI mean where do you draw the line? Shagging in a public park? Might as well keep it all behind doors, holding hands should be the limit.Quote:
Originally Posted by pacmar3yeah you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
showing your affection to someone you love must not necessarily shown on public.
Is it because you were never shown any attention or love as a child ?
You have the power to except everything and cease judgments of the self and others. Anything, even sickness or stuck fast ways can be experienced as self imposed learning curves that have brought you to a point of decision to embrace change.
(if a thought exists in you, you allowed it to have as much power over your future as you so allow).
That gives you the power to break the mold or chains of upbringing and run off free from the past.
If we love others and forgive all others everything knowing full well that we could probably be similar to them if given their dna their IQ and their upbringing or social shaping,they too could be similar to us with all of ours.
That allows you to forgive all and you are then experiencing more a part of the all from within. The new price is loss of some ego because that is what keeps us experiencing life as separate (or better or worse than others.) Its a small door to future freedom, but all of our egos are sneaky in all of us though, its chatting to you already, telling you this is bullshit in order to protect its self from the real loving compassionate you that can squash the worse of it in a blink if you choose to. When you allow,then the friction is no longer there for dis ease to continue. Its the fight that the ego wants to continue cause when its over, its over and change takes place.
He could go on a journey of self enlightenment I guess.....or the airline could just put up a 'no sexual contact in the aisle' sign.
The conversation had moved from the original point to what Miles stated above in bold.
He sounds fixed to a point by his upbringing.
Hmm could combine the two ideas and go against Virgin:
Enlightenment Aircorp International, new Gay flights into the area of your choice. :-0