Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dia bando
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dia bando
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
I still don't see what the fuss is about Cleverly. He has never fought anyone who poses even a slight challenge to him and has not looked all that impressive even in many of those fights. He has little power and no defence - he'll be exposed when he starts to step up in class. He might beat a 9,000 year old Hopkins (has this fight been made?) who throws more headbutts than punches these days, but I'm not certain he will.
Maybe he could give Bute, a crack at his title,:rolleyes:
While I'm no fan of Bute, he would destroy Cleverly.
Cleverly is approaching Bute territory in terms of his level of opposition, though Bute probably fought better competition through 25 fights.
I don't think so, Bute has no chin I have seen Cleverly box as a 16 year old, he was good then, winning
a Welsh ABA title, I've seen plenty of Champs in my time,and he's got what it takes it very rare I'm
WRONG.;)
Bute has a decent chin, he just has no defence. He took a million flush shots from Froch before he went down and Cleverly has nowhere near the power that Froch does.
You are wrong there, Bute is a bit like Khan on top fighter with a poor chin, Cleverly has a GOOD chin,
when he hit's them right he hurts them, his fitness and work rate are a major factor.
Nathan will out work a plodder like Hopkins, he will set a pace in a fight which his opponents don't
match. Again if Calzaghe RATE'S him you take a bit of notice, I remember him stopping a lad, from
my son's old club, in the first round, looking back he was a bit special.;)