-
Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Carl Froch: George Groves has blown his chance | Boxing News | ESPN.co.uk
He told Boxing News: "I don't think I need to fight George Groves again to prove anything because he [was an] unbeaten, young, hungry fighter, the best in Britain other than me, but I'm world champion and I've given him his chance - a chance I wasn't given to fight the best when I was at his stage in my career. He's had his chance and unfortunately he blew it."
I find this pretty disgusting. Groves didn't blow anything. Froch couldn't back up his pre-fight chat and Groves did exactly what he said he was going to do. Froch always wondered why he wasn't a marquee fighter and his personality had alot to do with it. After the fight he said "lets get the rematch on." If he bottles it it equates to a duck.
My guess is Froch is scared of losing a Ward payday. I think Hearn is trying to get Groves another world title, have Froch fight Ward and lose and then do the rematch later down the line when it means less.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Carl Froch: George Groves has blown his chance | Boxing News | ESPN.co.uk
He told Boxing News:
"I don't think I need to fight George Groves again to prove anything because he [was an] unbeaten, young, hungry fighter, the best in Britain other than me, but I'm world champion and I've given him his chance - a chance I wasn't given to fight the best when I was at his stage in my career. He's had his chance and unfortunately he blew it."
I find this pretty disgusting. Groves didn't blow anything. Froch couldn't back up his pre-fight chat and Groves did exactly what he said he was going to do. Froch always wondered why he wasn't a marquee fighter and his personality had alot to do with it. After the fight he said "lets get the rematch on." If he bottles it it equates to a duck.
My guess is Froch is scared of losing a Ward payday. I think Hearn is trying to get Groves another world title, have Froch fight Ward and lose and then do the rematch later down the line when it means less.
thing is mate if groves wasnt british the british fight fans would see this a totally different way
the fight was stopped far too early after froch had took a massive beating
Im not daft enought to even believe there was no corruption involved, like i said in another thread, it even looked like foster was looking to jump in earlier, and with the judging and all that
but if it was an overseas fighter froch wouldnt even have to explain himself now and you would be cheering him on to his next challenge, as would I and every brit on this forum who are so vocal about the decision
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
thing is mate if groves wasnt british the british fight fans would see this a totally different way
the fight was stopped far too early after froch had took a massive beating
Im not daft enought to even believe there was no corruption involved, like i said in another thread, it even looked like foster was looking to jump in earlier, and with the judging and all that
but if it was an overseas fighter froch wouldnt even have to explain himself now and you would be cheering him on to his next challenge, as would I and every brit on this forum who are so vocal about the decision
Absolutely not. I'm not that kind of boxing fan. Ricky Burns lost to Raymundo Beltran. He lost and they fucking robbed Beltran of his World title and judging like that gives Boxing in the UK a bad name. Burns owes Beltran a rematch with neutral judges. There needs to be a level of fairness in this sport but what happened last Saturday was utter bullshit and everyone in the arena saw it. Froch even told Hearn in front of the crowd to get the rematch on and now he is back peddling quicker than Michael Jackson doing a moonwalk. If it was the other way round, Froch would have screamed bullshit and demanded Groves give him a rematch and I'd have been on here saying how Froch deserved his shot and how Groves owed it to him. He needs to settle the score and back up his word. There is no way he can go into his retirement saying he is satisfied with that TKO on his resume because in his heart of hearts, he knows the ending was bullshit.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
thing is mate if groves wasnt british the british fight fans would see this a totally different way
the fight was stopped far too early after froch had took a massive beating
Im not daft enought to even believe there was no corruption involved, like i said in another thread, it even looked like foster was looking to jump in earlier, and with the judging and all that
but if it was an overseas fighter froch wouldnt even have to explain himself now and you would be cheering him on to his next challenge, as would I and every brit on this forum who are so vocal about the decision
Absolutely not. I'm not that kind of boxing fan. Ricky Burns lost to Raymundo Beltran. He lost and they fucking robbed Beltran of his World title and judging like that gives Boxing in the UK a bad name. Burns owes Beltran a rematch with neutral judges. There needs to be a level of fairness in this sport but what happened last Saturday was utter bullshit and everyone in the arena saw it. Froch even told Hearn in front of the crowd to get the rematch on and now he is back peddling quicker than Michael Jackson doing a moonwalk. If it was the other way round, Froch would have screamed bullshit and demanded Groves give him a rematch and I'd have been on here saying how Froch deserved his shot and how Groves owed it to him. He needs to settle the score and back up his word. There is no way he can go into his retirement saying he is satisfied with that TKO on his resume because in his heart of hearts, he knows the ending was bullshit.
i hear what you are saying and i agree with you but there is a major difference between those two fights
burns v beltram lasted its full duration and burns clearly lost but got the nod
Froch won his fight
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
thing is mate if groves wasnt british the british fight fans would see this a totally different way
the fight was stopped far too early after froch had took a massive beating
Im not daft enought to even believe there was no corruption involved, like i said in another thread, it even looked like foster was looking to jump in earlier, and with the judging and all that
but if it was an overseas fighter froch wouldnt even have to explain himself now and you would be cheering him on to his next challenge, as would I and every brit on this forum who are so vocal about the decision
Absolutely not. I'm not that kind of boxing fan. Ricky Burns lost to Raymundo Beltran. He lost and they fucking robbed Beltran of his World title and judging like that gives Boxing in the UK a bad name. Burns owes Beltran a rematch with neutral judges. There needs to be a level of fairness in this sport but what happened last Saturday was utter bullshit and everyone in the arena saw it. Froch even told Hearn in front of the crowd to get the rematch on and now he is back peddling quicker than Michael Jackson doing a moonwalk. If it was the other way round, Froch would have screamed bullshit and demanded Groves give him a rematch and I'd have been on here saying how Froch deserved his shot and how Groves owed it to him. He needs to settle the score and back up his word. There is no way he can go into his retirement saying he is satisfied with that TKO on his resume because in his heart of hearts, he knows the ending was bullshit.
i hear what you are saying and i agree with you but there is a major difference between those two fights
burns v beltram lasted its full duration and burns clearly lost but got the nod
Froch won his fight
My point is that it doesn't matter if he is foreign or not, if something shady goes down, then you should be giving him a rematch. That was a highly disputable ending and a rematch is warranted. I can't see why Froch would walk away from it, it is a much more winnable fight than Ward and he'd make alot of money from it.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
thing is mate if groves wasnt british the british fight fans would see this a totally different way
the fight was stopped far too early after froch had took a massive beating
Im not daft enought to even believe there was no corruption involved, like i said in another thread, it even looked like foster was looking to jump in earlier, and with the judging and all that
but if it was an overseas fighter froch wouldnt even have to explain himself now and you would be cheering him on to his next challenge, as would I and every brit on this forum who are so vocal about the decision
Absolutely not. I'm not that kind of boxing fan. Ricky Burns lost to Raymundo Beltran. He lost and they fucking robbed Beltran of his World title and judging like that gives Boxing in the UK a bad name. Burns owes Beltran a rematch with neutral judges. There needs to be a level of fairness in this sport but what happened last Saturday was utter bullshit and everyone in the arena saw it. Froch even told Hearn in front of the crowd to get the rematch on and now he is back peddling quicker than Michael Jackson doing a moonwalk. If it was the other way round, Froch would have screamed bullshit and demanded Groves give him a rematch and I'd have been on here saying how Froch deserved his shot and how Groves owed it to him. He needs to settle the score and back up his word. There is no way he can go into his retirement saying he is satisfied with that TKO on his resume because in his heart of hearts, he knows the ending was bullshit.
i hear what you are saying and i agree with you but there is a major difference between those two fights
burns v beltram lasted its full duration and burns clearly lost but got the nod
Froch won his fight
My point is that it doesn't matter if he is foreign or not, if something shady goes down, then you should be giving him a rematch. That was a highly disputable ending and a rematch is warranted. I can't see why Froch would walk away from it, it is a much more winnable fight than Ward and he'd make alot of money from it.
i know what you are saying and again i fully agree, but what im saying is if he was foreign you wouldnt care
and neither would i
my feeling would probably be, phew froch got away with that, and then id go on to cook a nice sunday roast and forget all about it
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
This is the whole crux of the argument and why Froch was so heavily booed. The British Public like an underdog and have very little time for braggarts or those who shout about their own achievements and Carl could have helped himself by being a little more gracious and magnanimous about the situation, post fight. Instead he has virtually reverted to the pre-fight stance that he had, suggesting George was not even in his league and should be grateful for having shared a ring with him. The push bike incident encapsulates it perfectly. "Carl Froch A Legend in his own Lunch Time"
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
This is the whole crux of the argument and why Froch was so heavily booed. The British Public like an underdog and have very little time for braggarts or those who shout about their own achievements and Carl could have helped himself by being a little more gracious and magnanimous about the situation, post fight. Instead he has virtually reverted to the pre-fight stance that he had, suggesting George was not even in his league and should be grateful for having shared a ring with him. The push bike incident encapsulates it perfectly.
"Carl Froch A Legend in his own Lunch Time"
In the same way that Lennox Lewis got booed for carving up Vitali, because of all the smack he was talking?
It was typical dare I say it Manchester home of the Ricky Hatton boxing/football thick as fuck boxing fan, mentality.
Short of bending over like a bitch there was nothing Froch could have said that would have kept the boo boys at bay.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
This is the whole crux of the argument and why Froch was so heavily booed. The British Public like an underdog and have very little time for braggarts or those who shout about their own achievements and Carl could have helped himself by being a little more gracious and magnanimous about the situation, post fight. Instead he has virtually reverted to the pre-fight stance that he had, suggesting George was not even in his league and should be grateful for having shared a ring with him. The push bike incident encapsulates it perfectly.
"Carl Froch A Legend in his own Lunch Time"
In the same way that Lennox Lewis got booed for carving up Vitali, because of all the smack he was talking?
It was typical dare I say it Manchester home of the Ricky Hatton boxing/football thick as fuck boxing fan, mentality.
Short of bending over like a bitch there was nothing Froch could have said that would have kept the boo boys at bay.
I don't agree. The boos were only directed at Froch when he was halfway through the sentence 'Yeah I thought it was a good decision'.
I used to like Froch. Then hated him then liked him. But now I think in retrospect he has always been an annoying cunt and a hypocrite.
'George Groves has been really rude and childish! 'oh, and his breath is smelly!'. Yeah Carl, nice one.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
This is the whole crux of the argument and why Froch was so heavily booed. The British Public like an underdog and have very little time for braggarts or those who shout about their own achievements and Carl could have helped himself by being a little more gracious and magnanimous about the situation, post fight. Instead he has virtually reverted to the pre-fight stance that he had, suggesting George was not even in his league and should be grateful for having shared a ring with him. The push bike incident encapsulates it perfectly.
"Carl Froch A Legend in his own Lunch Time"
In the same way that Lennox Lewis got booed for carving up Vitali, because of all the smack he was talking?
It was typical dare I say it Manchester home of the Ricky Hatton boxing/football thick as fuck boxing fan, mentality.
Short of bending over like a bitch there was nothing Froch could have said that would have kept the boo boys at bay.
That is just not true he was very condescending and continues to be so. This is what Groves said at ringside after the fight
George Groves: 'He caught me with a good shot but I had Carl buzzed much more.
'I have a chinny image and it got stopped early.
'He has warrior reputation that he got the benefit of the doubt.
'I stuck to a game plan, I told you what was going to happen.
'Now I'm getting cheered.
'I'm so proud to give this display
'I know I'm going to be great fighter
'I had it taken away from me unjustly.
'I'll be back fitter and stronger.'
This is what Froch said
Carl Froch: 'It was a fair enough stoppage. I hit him with two shots and had a free shot.
'The ref is six inches away, he looks at the fighters eyes and has to make a split second decision.
'It's the refs decision. I don't have any sympathy because it's in the refs hands. He has to protect the fighters.' I am amazing and probably the greatest fighter Britain if not the world has ever seen. Ali may have had his bike stolen but he didn't have to grow up in Nottingham and fight the likes of Robin Reid (Action man) as well. I mean the guy may have been called the grim reaper but he had a really annoying voice that you activated by pulling a string and gripping hands and everything.Compared to him George was easy I proved that I am Ironman without needing the suit. I used the first round to batter his right hand with my Iron jaw and then when George was breaking the rules by trying to punch me the ref had to get him in a headlock to stop him. I am brilliant me, and could have probably taught Brian Clough a thing or two about football as well as winning one of the Nobel thingies and I could have won the space race because I am that hard even gravity can't hold me down. Why are you all booing? He is the Chelsea fan'
I may have added the green bit.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Froch will not take Ward immediately because he will lose more likely he will take on Chavez Jnr or GGG for lucrative money. I think Froch would have won the fight because he was coming on strong and would have taken the latter rounds and got the decision but we will never know now to the eternal shame of the ref.
Groves is a free agent to he could sign for GBP and fight in the US ot he could re-sign with Hearn and take on the other champions.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
This is the whole crux of the argument and why Froch was so heavily booed. The British Public like an underdog and have very little time for braggarts or those who shout about their own achievements and Carl could have helped himself by being a little more gracious and magnanimous about the situation, post fight. Instead he has virtually reverted to the pre-fight stance that he had, suggesting George was not even in his league and should be grateful for having shared a ring with him. The push bike incident encapsulates it perfectly.
"Carl Froch A Legend in his own Lunch Time"
In the same way that Lennox Lewis got booed for carving up Vitali, because of all the smack he was talking?
It was typical dare I say it Manchester home of the Ricky Hatton boxing/football thick as fuck boxing fan, mentality.
Short of bending over like a bitch there was nothing Froch could have said that would have kept the boo boys at bay.
That is just not true he was very condescending and continues to be so. This is what Groves said at ringside after the fight
George Groves: 'He caught me with a good shot but I had Carl buzzed much more.
'I have a chinny image and it got stopped early.
'He has warrior reputation that he got the benefit of the doubt.
'I stuck to a game plan, I told you what was going to happen.
'Now I'm getting cheered.
'I'm so proud to give this display
'I know I'm going to be great fighter
'I had it taken away from me unjustly.
'I'll be back fitter and stronger.'
This is what Froch said
Carl Froch: 'It was a fair enough stoppage. I hit him with two shots and had a free shot.
'The ref is six inches away, he looks at the fighters eyes and has to make a split second decision.
'It's the refs decision. I don't have any sympathy because it's in the refs hands. He has to protect the fighters.' I am amazing and probably the greatest fighter Britain if not the world has ever seen. Ali may have had his bike stolen but he didn't have to grow up in Nottingham and fight the likes of Robin Reid (Action man) as well. I mean the guy may have been called the grim reaper but he had a really annoying voice that you activated by pulling a string and gripping hands and everything.Compared to him George was easy I proved that I am Ironman without needing the suit. I used the first round to batter his right hand with my Iron jaw and then when George was breaking the rules by trying to punch me the ref had to get him in a headlock to stop him. I am brilliant me, and could have probably taught Brian Clough a thing or two about football as well as winning one of the Nobel thingies and I could have won the space race because I am that hard even gravity can't hold me down. Why are you all booing? He is the Chelsea fan'
I may have added the green bit.
Despite adding your own words, it was still shorter than Frochs waffle. He was digging his own likability grave for ages.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
If froch doesn't rematch groves I will have lost a lot of respect for him .
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
If froch doesn't rematch groves I will have lost a lot of respect for him .
Froch took a long think about this and made this choice. He is a great warrior but groves completely threw him out of his game.
Froch did finish stronger but he has never ever been knocked down like that and it affected him deeply.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
If it looks like a duck & sounds like a duck, then it probably is...
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I have a hard time believing he would stand to make more money rematching Ward in the States than Groves at home:dontknow: There is no way Ward would travel to the UK for it sadly, and there is also virtually no way Froch could beat him. Don't see what else is on the table unless Chavez Jr would actually fight him.
Its going to be kinda funny when he cant get Chavez cause it makes no sense and Ward says well "he had his chance and he blew it"
This is the whole crux of the argument and why Froch was so heavily booed. The British Public like an underdog and have very little time for braggarts or those who shout about their own achievements and Carl could have helped himself by being a little more gracious and magnanimous about the situation, post fight. Instead he has virtually reverted to the pre-fight stance that he had, suggesting George was not even in his league and should be grateful for having shared a ring with him. The push bike incident encapsulates it perfectly.
"Carl Froch A Legend in his own Lunch Time"
In the same way that Lennox Lewis got booed for carving up Vitali, because of all the smack he was talking?
It was typical dare I say it Manchester home of the Ricky Hatton boxing/football thick as fuck boxing fan, mentality.
Short of bending over like a bitch there was nothing Froch could have said that would have kept the boo boys at bay.
I don't agree. The boos were only directed at Froch when he was halfway through the sentence 'Yeah I thought it was a good decision'.
Which was kind of my point. Of course he thought it was a good decision, he was on the winning end of it. He did go on to clarify this by saying of course he thinks its a good decision and of course George Groves thinks its a bad call. Go ahead and boo the decision all you like but don't boo me, I've given enough for you cunts over the years and I've done it again tonight you ignorant benders.
Froch was asked the question, he got half way through saying yes and the boo boys were on him, from that point on they were for him and not the decision. Its what happens. Personally I don't have any problem with how Froch addressed it.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
The fact is Froch is a cunt. Always has been always will be. He is a top fighter, but not an all time great. His record is good but not great. Lost to Ward and Kessler (his best 2 opponents) beat a past it Kesseler, scraped past a blown up Taylor, got a gift against Groves and got very generous cards v Pascal, and a decision against Dirrel where if it was in Dirrels home town he would likely have got the decision. He also beat a blown up middleweight in Abraham.
Fights that are acceptable to me, Groves rematch, Ward rematch, DeGale, Rodriguez, Stieglitz or Bika (just to unify) or for the laught Callum Smith, mainly cz I reckon Smith smokes him
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Man I ain't even going to read the article, and I do believe that froch was going to get a legit stoppage eventually, but I am sorry he has to yet knock groves out cause that stoppage was shit as we all know, seems like he wants no part of groves.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
wow the nerves on this guy lol.. I never saw this side of Froch until now. He always struck me as a no nonsense fighter but the bitch has come out of him.. He'd be better off if he rather said he's looking for bigger fights but for him to say some crazy shit like " Groves is not elite ", " Groves blew it " etc is just makes him look delusional.
It's the most blatant duck ive seen..
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
wow the nerves on this guy lol.. I never saw this side of Froch until now. He always struck me as a no nonsense fighter but the bitch has come out of him.. He'd be better off if he rather said he's looking for bigger fights but for him to say some crazy shit like " Groves is not elite ", " Groves blew it " etc is just makes him look delusional.
It's the most blatant duck ive seen..
if groves was some african or someone from somewhere else nobody would be bothered about all this, everyone would be happy for froch to move on
i for one agree the stoppage was pretty dodgy looking, if it all came out tomorrow that it was all crooked it wouldnt shock me one bit
i am also not of the general opinion that froch would have won anyway, the way froch was getting rocked by every shot and his last two lame attempts at punches after the ref had grabbed groves kneck showed just how out of it froch was, and i think there was much more chance of groves knocking froch out
having said all that, its only because groves is an englishman that everyone is still talking about it
-
Eric, the "English" thing is a bit of a red herring.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Froch knows that Groves wont make the same mistakes again. The fans want it, the tv people want it, Groves wants it, it will be massive money and Froch dont fancy it. I never thought i would say this about Froch but he is a ducker, if Groves is so easy fight him again for more money than any fight in any place on the planet fucking pussy cunt.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Eric, the "English" thing is a bit of a red herring.
how come?
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Eric, the "English" thing is a bit of a red herring.
how come?
Because we keep telling you that its bullshit. Like I said, I want Burns to rematch Beltran because they fucking robbed the guy and I'm getting a bit sick of early stoppages and dodgy decisions going down under our Jurisdiction. We are not Germany and we should not be robbing fighters like this. We're getting a bad reputation and the board should be fucking ashamed of themselves for allowing it to happen without doing anything about it.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Eric, the "English" thing is a bit of a red herring.
how come?
Because we keep telling you that its bullshit. Like I said, I want Burns to rematch Beltran because they fucking robbed the guy and I'm getting a bit sick of early stoppages and dodgy decisions going down under our Jurisdiction. We are not Germany and we should not be robbing fighters like this. We're getting a bad reputation and the board should be fucking ashamed of themselves for allowing it to happen without doing anything about it.
the burns beltram fight has almost been forgotten, it wasnt mentioned on here after a couple of days and has only really come to light again because of froch groves
and burns and beltram was a blatent robbery
froch won by TKO
if burns beltram had ended the way froch groves did then at the end of the fight someone would have said - "that was a bit of an early stoppage", and then his mate would have said "yeah it was wasnt it", then the first fella would have said "shall we get a kebab"
and that would have been that
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Eric, the "English" thing is a bit of a red herring.
how come?
Because we keep telling you that its bullshit. Like I said, I want Burns to rematch Beltran because they fucking robbed the guy and I'm getting a bit sick of early stoppages and dodgy decisions going down under our Jurisdiction. We are not Germany and we should not be robbing fighters like this. We're getting a bad reputation and the board should be fucking ashamed of themselves for allowing it to happen without doing anything about it.
the burns beltram fight has almost been forgotten, it wasnt mentioned on here after a couple of days and has only really come to light again because of froch groves
and burns and beltram was a blatent robbery
froch won by TKO
if burns beltram had ended the way froch groves did then at the end of the fight someone would have said - "that was a bit of an early stoppage", and then his mate would have said "yeah it was wasnt it", then the first fella would have said "shall we get a kebab"
and that would have been that
Again, I didn't think that. I know Burns shouldn't be champion. I never said "oh well". I've always bitched about it to my friends. And I'm not a massive fan of kebabs, would rather have a burger.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Eric, the "English" thing is a bit of a red herring.
how come?
Because we keep telling you that its bullshit. Like I said, I want Burns to rematch Beltran because they fucking robbed the guy and I'm getting a bit sick of early stoppages and dodgy decisions going down under our Jurisdiction. We are not Germany and we should not be robbing fighters like this. We're getting a bad reputation and the board should be fucking ashamed of themselves for allowing it to happen without doing anything about it.
the burns beltram fight has almost been forgotten, it wasnt mentioned on here after a couple of days and has only really come to light again because of froch groves
and burns and beltram was a blatent robbery
froch won by TKO
if burns beltram had ended the way froch groves did then at the end of the fight someone would have said - "that was a bit of an early stoppage", and then his mate would have said "yeah it was wasnt it", then the first fella would have said "shall we get a kebab"
and that would have been that
Again, I didn't think that. I know Burns shouldn't be champion. I never said "oh well". I've always bitched about it to my friends. And I'm not a massive fan of kebabs, would rather have a burger.
ok perhaps the odd person who isnt mexican does still go on about burns beltram, but noone and i mean noone prefers burgers to kebabs
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Not everyone in England eats Kebabs. There is the flaw in your argument Eric.
http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI...8R-9992669.jpg
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
does everyone in france eat croissants and frogs legs?
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Most people I know would rather have a burger...
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Most people I know would rather have a burger...
southern?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Most people I know would rather have a burger...
southern?
1.Alan Shearer
2.Sting
3.AdamGB
4.Jimmy Nail
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Most people I know would rather have a burger...
southern?
1.Alan Shearer
2.Sting
3.AdamGB
4.Jimmy Nail
doesnt add up because
1.Alan Shearer - Chicken Kebab
2.Sting - Seekh Kebab
3.AdamGB - Burger
4.Jimmy Nail - Large donna
-
Master is not going to be happy about your Sikh kebab.
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
doesnt add up because
1.Alan Shearer - Chicken Kebab
2.Sting - Seekh Kebab
3.AdamGB - Burger
4.Jimmy Nail - Large donna
So Jimmy nailed Large Donna? Who knew @Jimanuel Boogustus was into fat birds?
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Almost...
Try Newcastle Upon Tyne, the northernmost city in England. ;)
Drunk people and loud, obnoxious Football yobs may like Kebabs... They don't make up more than a small bit of us.
Edit: beaten to the punch! ;D
-
Re: Froch: No rematch, Groves had his chance and he blew it!
Wasn't Shearer on McDonalds' adverts? He's either a burger man or a sellout!
