-
Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Fuck Eubank, let him earn it. He's mandatory for a World Title , and he decides to sack his promoter and take a British title shot instead!
Mind you, according to Daddy, he would "beat Golovkin tomorrow."
Yeah, alright then.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Fuck Eubank, let him earn it. He's mandatory for a World Title , and he decides to sack his promoter and take a British title shot instead!
Mind you, according to Daddy, he would "beat Golovkin tomorrow."
Yeah, alright then.
:lol:
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Saunders promised eubank a rematch after he won a title. So Saunders has his title so he should honour his word and offer the re match but don't see if happening if I'm honest, I think Saunders knows he will get beat and would rather get beaten by a bigger name than eubank jr.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Saunders promised eubank a rematch after he won a title. So Saunders has his title so he should honour his word and offer the re match but don't see if happening if I'm honest, I think Saunders knows he will get beat and would rather get beaten by a bigger name than eubank jr.
Saunders said he would give him a rematch on his terms after he won a title.
I don't know if discussions have even been mentioned yet but I can see that being a massive sticking point given the size of JR's ego
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
I think the rematch would be all Eubank, he started way to late in the first fight.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I think the rematch would be all Eubank, he started way to late in the first fight.
So what would Eubank do differently ? Why did he start so slow?
Maybe he started slow because he didn't have enough ringcraft to suss Saunders out?
If it happened again, the result would be the same.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I think the rematch would be all Eubank, he started way to late in the first fight.
So what would Eubank do differently ? Why did he start so slow?
Maybe he started slow because he didn't have enough ringcraft to suss Saunders out?
If it happened again, the result would be the same.
Agreed.
Saunders is good
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Genuine 50/50 fight for me. Push came to shove and I was given a free bet on either Id prob take Eunbank.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Genuine 50/50 fight for me. Push came to shove and I was given a free bet on either Id prob take Eunbank.
If it happens, and you give me even Money, I might have a bit for Saunders with you if you like. π
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Genuine 50/50 fight for me. Push came to shove and I was given a free bet on either Id prob take Eunbank.
If it happens, and you give me even Money, I might have a bit for Saunders with you if you like. π
Genuinely think youll get bigger then evens on Saunders. Eubank is the popular selection here so will see money for him like we did in 1st fight. Id prob back Saunders at 5/4 or bigger.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Genuine 50/50 fight for me. Push came to shove and I was given a free bet on either Id prob take Eunbank.
If it happens, and you give me even Money, I might have a bit for Saunders with you if you like. π
Genuinely think youll get bigger then evens on Saunders. Eubank is the popular selection here so will see money for him like we did in 1st fight. Id prob back Saunders at 5/4 or bigger.
If you dont Ill lay you a bet on it at evens :D
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Genuine 50/50 fight for me. Push came to shove and I was given a free bet on either Id prob take Eunbank.
If it happens, and you give me even Money, I might have a bit for Saunders with you if you like. π
Genuinely think youll get bigger then evens on Saunders. Eubank is the popular selection here so will see money for him like we did in 1st fight. Id prob back Saunders at 5/4 or bigger.
If you dont Ill lay you a bet on it at evens :D
Wow! Based on what you've said , I'll take a rain check on your generous offer, but thanks all the same. ;D
Now I'm hoping this fight comes off, because I can't see past Saunders, so I probably would take a punt on it.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I think the rematch would be all Eubank, he started way to late in the first fight.
So what would Eubank do differently ? Why did he start so slow?
Maybe he started slow because he didn't have enough ringcraft to suss Saunders out?
If it happened again, the result would be the same.
He didn't have ANY experience, it was the first good boxer he had faced and he was able to hurt him repeatedly once he found a home for his shots. You could be right, but that wouldn't say much for Eubank. I feel like rematches usually go to the guy who was able to genuinely hurt their man the first time.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
I rewatched the fight a while back and I got the feeling that BJS got into a tear up because he wanted to, we all know that he has a few stamina issues but I think he felt like he had a point to prove so once he knew he had the rounds in the bag he went and traded.
it isn't as simple as that obviously but I've had a drink but that is what I got out of the re-watch anyway, first time round I thought that JR would have him quite easily in a rematch, after watching it again I'm not sure, plus I think for as powerful as JR looks I'm not sure about his power, the uppercuts he lands should be laying people out.
I back BJS in a rematch
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
I have decided that Saunders is overrated and I'm going to back him to lose by KO every time he fights, don't mind me;D
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I think the rematch would be all Eubank, he started way to late in the first fight.
So what would Eubank do differently ? Why did he start so slow?
Maybe he started slow because he didn't have enough ringcraft to suss Saunders out?
If it happened again, the result would be the same.
He didn't have ANY experience, it was the first good boxer he had faced and he was able to hurt him repeatedly once he found a home for his shots. You could be right, but that wouldn't say much for Eubank. I feel like rematches usually go to the guy who was able to genuinely hurt their man the first time.
Yes he has more experience, but my point is he needs to do something better than he did in the first fight. Those first 6 rounds weren't a slow start , it was a "Boxing brain" thing.
He needs to find a way to get in range and land , maybe improved footwork . Those are things I haven't seen.
He was managing to land in the second half of the fights because he was fitter than Saunders, I'll give him that all day long.
My point is that Saunders is a good , but not brilliant fighter, but he was far too savvy for Eubank, so where does that put Eubank?
Answer. Not as good as him or many people think.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
You're probably right, and I kind of wasn't factoring in the two being the same age. Even still, there are no good fighters in England, they all bums! I got milk baby!
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
You're probably right, and I kind of wasn't factoring in the two being the same age. Even still, there are no good fighters in England, they all bums! I got milk baby!
sounds like fighting talk right there my friend...Terry Flanagan is from England and he is a world champion I'll have you know
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
You're probably right, and I kind of wasn't factoring in the two being the same age. Even still, there are no good fighters in England, they all bums! I got milk baby!
sounds like fighting talk right there my friend...Terry Flanagan is from England and he is a world champion I'll have you know
http://ll-media.tmz.com/2014/11/14/1...aunch-v2-3.jpg
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Eubank is better now as he has gone the distance and that experience will give him extra confidence in the rematch.
Saunders will be better because he is now champion and will pace himself better.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
I was in the Jr would win a rematch camp. However, watching their latest fights against Spike and Lee I don't see why Billy Joe wouldn't outbox him again. To slick, clever with no evidence he can be easily chinned.
I also think Jr's power is overrated. He hits good fighters with the kitchen sink without decking them. Either he's unfortunate to keep coming up against granite beards or he's not banging as hard as it looks.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Saunders promised eubank a rematch after he won a title. So Saunders has his title so he should honour his word and offer the re match but don't see if happening if I'm honest, I think Saunders knows he will get beat and would rather get beaten by a bigger name than eubank jr.
Saunders said he would give him a rematch on his terms after he won a title.
I don't know if discussions have even been mentioned yet but I can see that being a massive sticking point given the size of JR's ego
I'm not too sure about that, I think eubank would fight him for free to be honest he's desperate for that re match
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Saunders promised eubank a rematch after he won a title. So Saunders has his title so he should honour his word and offer the re match but don't see if happening if I'm honest, I think Saunders knows he will get beat and would rather get beaten by a bigger name than eubank jr.
Saunders said he would give him a rematch on his terms after he won a title.
I don't know if discussions have even been mentioned yet but I can see that being a massive sticking point given the size of JR's ego
I'm not too sure about that,
I think eubank would fight him for free to be honest he's desperate for that re match
I don't think Eubank or his Dad would even Fart for free! If you don't believe me, ask Hearn or Warren . He's left Hearn to pursue a British Title belt over a World Title strap for the sake of 10 or 20 grand, and Warren has said on numerous occasions that they are impossible to do business with.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Saunders promised eubank a rematch after he won a title. So Saunders has his title so he should honour his word and offer the re match but don't see if happening if I'm honest, I think Saunders knows he will get beat and would rather get beaten by a bigger name than eubank jr.
Saunders said he would give him a rematch on his terms after he won a title.
I don't know if discussions have even been mentioned yet but I can see that being a massive sticking point given the size of JR's ego
I'm not too sure about that,
I think eubank would fight him for free to be honest he's desperate for that re match
I don't think Eubank or his Dad would even Fart for free! If you don't believe me, ask Hearn or Warren . He's left Hearn to pursue a British Title belt over a World Title strap for the sake of 10 or 20 grand, and Warren has said on numerous occasions that they are impossible to do business with.
Obviously he was joking about free but what he is saying Eubank would jump at a chance for revenge but he will wait as he has his pride and ego.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I think the rematch would be all Eubank, he started way to late in the first fight.
So what would Eubank do differently ? Why did he start so slow?
Maybe he started slow because he didn't have enough ringcraft to suss Saunders out?
If it happened again, the result would be the same.
He didn't have ANY experience, it was the first good boxer he had faced and he was able to hurt him repeatedly once he found a home for his shots. You could be right, but that wouldn't say much for Eubank. I feel like rematches usually go to the guy who was able to genuinely hurt their man the first time.
Froch/Groves comes to mind? Shavers/Holmes? lololol... Corrales/Castillo?
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
I was in the Jr would win a rematch camp. However, watching their latest fights against Spike and Lee I don't see why Billy Joe wouldn't outbox him again. To slick, clever with no evidence he can be easily chinned.
I also think Jr's power is overrated. He hits good fighters with the kitchen sink without decking them. Either he's unfortunate to keep coming up against granite beards or he's not banging as hard as it looks.
He's not a banger. Partly because he is not that good of a boxer. Saunders chinned Lee because Saunders knew how to punch, and Lee was just standing there.... Eubank couldn's possibly chin Lee by the way he fights.
All that said, Jr. has that "Larry Holmes" kinda power. Not enough to disable you like a frag grenade, and certainly not nuclear bomb power ala Tyson/Lewis/Tua, but more like FLASHBANG grenades.... that if thrown close enough you can rip your arm off, or lose an eye, at the very least. But to say it would be fatal upon impact each and every time? Nahh... Just enough to disorient you from seeing the incoming fire, which by both Holmes and Eubank's standards IS fast and furious.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
Saunders promised eubank a rematch after he won a title. So Saunders has his title so he should honour his word and offer the re match but don't see if happening if I'm honest, I think Saunders knows he will get beat and would rather get beaten by a bigger name than eubank jr.
Saunders said he would give him a rematch on his terms after he won a title.
I don't know if discussions have even been mentioned yet but I can see that being a massive sticking point given the size of JR's ego
I'm not too sure about that,
I think eubank would fight him for free to be honest he's desperate for that re match
I don't think Eubank or his Dad would even Fart for free! If you don't believe me, ask Hearn or Warren . He's left Hearn to pursue a British Title belt over a World Title strap for the sake of 10 or 20 grand, and Warren has said on numerous occasions that they are impossible to do business with.
Obviously he was joking about free but what he is saying Eubank would jump at a chance for revenge but he will wait as he has his pride and ego.
Of course he'd jump at the chance for revenge, who wouldn't ? But it don't work like that, he has to do something to earn it, and beating O'Sullivan isn't enough. And the pride and ego that you mention is exactly what holds the fight back. Team Eubank don't and won't accept that they are the "B" side in this scenario.
If Saunders wasn't Champ and didn't have a load of options, yeah , he'd entertain all the shit that comes with dealing with the Eubanks, but as it stands , the fight only happens on Saunders' terms at the moment and that's why I don't think it'll happen.
Saunders should fight Canelo if he has the choice WITHOUT CATCHWEIGHTS!!!
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
I believe Eubank can go one better and win a legitimate title and then will have more leverage over Saunders.
Ironically a bit like when Benn won the WBC title in Italy and negotiated a better deal against his dad.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I believe Eubank can go one better and win a legitimate title and then will have more leverage over Saunders.
Ironically a bit like when Benn won the WBC title in Italy and negotiated a better deal against his dad.
I don't reckon a Eubank will beat Jacobs IF he ever fights him, and I don't think he fancies his chances either. The only other champs are Saunders, Canelo & GGG.
And anyway , what do you mean by "can go one better and win a legitimate title ?" Isn't Saunders Title legitimate? And if Eubank wins one , why is it "one better?" :)
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
I think Eubank will win, probably even by stopping Saunders should they rematch.
Even on Eubank's worse night. Where there was no order in his corner, where he gave the first 4 rounds away, even with all that, it was only S.D win for Saunders. I did think Saunders nicked it though, but in a rematch, with Adam Booth there and the fact that Eubank has improved, to me there is only one winner.
Or maybe Saunders is just one of them fighters were you have to get in the ring with him, to realise how hard he is to beat.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I believe Eubank can go one better and win a legitimate title and then will have more leverage over Saunders.
Ironically a bit like when Benn won the WBC title in Italy and negotiated a better deal against his dad.
I don't reckon a Eubank will beat Jacobs IF he ever fights him, and I don't think he fancies his chances either. The only other champs are Saunders, Canelo & GGG.
And anyway , what do you mean by "can go one better and win a legitimate title ?" Isn't Saunders Title legitimate? And if Eubank wins one , why is it "one better?" :)
Everyone knows WBO is 4th rate title and Eubank could easily beat Canelo and should be able to beat Jacobs once he feels he is ready.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Believe it or not, there was a time in boxing when champions would use their optionals to unify and/or make super fights. Now they are used to avoid.
Saunders/Eubank rematch is a worthy one but the title does not even need to be involved and in fact both make more money w/o the sanctioning fees. That can wait.
Its getting to the point for this old guy that I may hand in my fan card and take a hiatus from the sport. All I'd have to do was read fightnews daily to sustain that hiatus. I'm awfully sick and tired of the litany of excuses as to why champions don't fight each other and in many cases don't even want to. That says something very deep. This "boxing is a business" excuse has a tooth so long its come through the top of its head. It really has become fundamentally a different sport.
Saunders by some accounts has been offered over 3 million green backs to unify with Golovkin. The thing here is, he will most likely make as much money afterward in future fights with a loss to this guy.
Its not a legacy killer in anyway given the opponent. However if he loses to someone else for a million, not only is his future pay in question but people will call him a one and done. I'm not trying to dump on Billy here because its most likely Warren making all the decisions and he aint got to many tetes left. But the Kazak has even said he'd go to England. By the time Billy gets a cut of the ppv, gate etc etc he would probably make 5 mil.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I believe Eubank can go one better and win a legitimate title and then will have more leverage over Saunders.
Ironically a bit like when Benn won the WBC title in Italy and negotiated a better deal against his dad.
I don't reckon a Eubank will beat Jacobs IF he ever fights him, and I don't think he fancies his chances either. The only other champs are Saunders, Canelo & GGG.
And anyway , what do you mean by "can go one better and win a legitimate title ?" Isn't Saunders Title legitimate? And if Eubank wins one , why is it "one better?" :)
Everyone knows WBO is 4th rate title and Eubank could easily beat Canelo and should be able to beat Jacobs once he feels he is ready.
At least WBO don't have Interim, regular and Super Champions! 3 champs in 1 fucking Division!! So is a WBO Champ trump a "regular champ?"
Come on, they're all as bad as each other.
So Eubank can beat Canelo easy? And he's not ready for Jacobs, but he'd beat GGG tomorrow according to Pop! Don't believe all the hype you read Master, let your own eyes tell you.
Btw, if the WBO is a 4th rate title, perhaps we shouldn't count British WBO champions! ν ½νΈ
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
denilson200
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Do you lads fancy that? Personally it doesn't matter as much to me, but it may be a good way for Eubank to get some redemption and for Saunders to make some money on the cheap without having to go through a gruelling GGG match.
Saunders surprised me with the Lee win. I felt Lee held back a little. But at the end of the day, not really sure if Lee pulled the fight because he didn't want to even discuss the possibility of fighting GGG. Stranger things have happened.
But, Eubank/Saunders rematch? Saunders may not give him one, and why should he? lol....
;D
I think Eubank will win, probably even by stopping Saunders should they rematch.
Even on Eubank's worse night. Where there was no order in his corner, where he gave the first 4 rounds away, even with all that, it was only S.D win for Saunders. I did think Saunders nicked it though, but in a rematch, with Adam Booth there and the fact that Eubank has improved, to me there is only one winner.
Or maybe Saunders is just one of
them fighters were you have to get in the ring with him, to realise how hard he is to beat.
The word you are looking for is " those"
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I believe Eubank can go one better and win a legitimate title and then will have more leverage over Saunders.
Ironically a bit like when Benn won the WBC title in Italy and negotiated a better deal against his dad.
I don't reckon a Eubank will beat Jacobs IF he ever fights him, and I don't think he fancies his chances either. The only other champs are Saunders, Canelo & GGG.
And anyway , what do you mean by "can go one better and win a legitimate title ?" Isn't Saunders Title legitimate? And if Eubank wins one , why is it "one better?" :)
Everyone knows WBO is 4th rate title and Eubank could easily beat Canelo and should be able to beat Jacobs once he feels he is ready.
At least WBO don't have Interim, regular and Super Champions! 3 champs in 1 fucking Division!! So is a WBO Champ trump a "regular champ?"
Come on, there all as bad as each other.
So Eubank can beat Canelo easy? And he's not ready for Jacobs, but he'd beat GGG tomorrow according to Pop! Don't believe all the hype you read Master, let your own eyes tell you.
Btw, if the WBO is a 4th rate title, perhaps we shouldn't count British WBO champions! π
Yea I would have thought the WBO is one of the best. WBA are a joke and IBF arent any better. WBC are very biased to Mexican fighters.
-
Re: Eubank/Saunders rematch?
Absolutely ridiculous these days to claim one belt is superior to another. However, the WBA are by far the biggest piss takers and have the least credibility.
