Printable View
His last fight he was dominating Dimitrenko, he had his opponent down in round 1, 2 and round 3.
His opponent went down and took a knee.. His knee was clearly down then he fired a shot straight into the guys ribs.
That was the knockout blow, he should have clearly been disqualified
BUT NOOOO.. protect the prospects, doesn't matter that he was winning clearly he should have been DQd
Are you mad?
That fight was one way traffic and the guy was looking for a way out of the fight. It would have been an in justice if they disqualified him just like Roy Jones first loss. It was wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
2 fighters with records 15-15-10 and that's a DQ.
Rules are rules and he broke the rules. He hit a guy who was down and the ref knew it because he initially waved his hands saying no KD and once he noticed the guy was staying down he started counting.
Ref protected Parkers record, he bottled it.
Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
The opponent was a joke and surprised he was even rated that high. He did not even try. Forget rules and use your common sense. It would have been a travesty if they disqualified Parker. The man was faking the injury and he should be a actor not a boxer.
@Memphis haha, I'm sitting in work. Have not gave up on the video format.Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis
Master even if Dimitrenko wasn't injured and he was acting, it's an illegal shot.
It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it? ;)
I honestly never seen Parker fight before but I was appalled by the lack of effort by his opponent. No way that cunt deserves the fight by disqualification.Quote:
Originally Posted by VendettosFunny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it? ;)
I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch
hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
Even eric44 is talking sense now.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterEven eric44 is talking sense now.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Probably more on how the fight is going.Quote:
Originally Posted by VendettosI don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterEven eric44 is talking sense now.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Terry Norris, one of my favourite fighter was disqualified twice against the same person (also faking) and I was more annoyed at Terry for making the mistake.
Roy Jones should never have been disqualified.
Arthur Abrahams not so sure
I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
Should AJ have been DQ's?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbpNuLqXcYg
Dimitrenko wasn't winning but come on, that's a cheap one right there.......arm up, ribs exposed, that'll put anyone down
Nigel Benn would have another 3 or 4 losses by DQ if we go to the letter of the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos
He should have had those losses.....Hell McClellan beat the piss out of him and any other ref would have stopped that fightQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
So did Tyson.
Yeah against Savarese he really went nutsQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
To box again
So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?
You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.
P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
I'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.Quote:
Originally Posted by BatmanSo what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?
You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.
P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
So if the person on the receiving end plays it up and makes out they are unable to continue then it's a DQ?Quote:
Originally Posted by VendettosI'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.Quote:
Originally Posted by BatmanSo what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?
You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.
P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
It's a man's sport, I get what you are saying but I think a lot of it is down to the ref to make a judgement call.
If he thinks someone is playing it up as an excuse to get outta there then fuck em and that is precisely what happened in the Parker fight
why should he have stopped the fight?Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongHe should have had those losses.....Hell McClellan beat the piss out of him and any other ref would have stopped that fightQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
@Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterDirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
LOL when I first saw the punch I thought it was nothing but Dirrell was seriously hurt. Now I am not sure if it was that particular punch that caused him the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44@Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterDirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Remember Eubank v Dan Sherry and the back header?
was he fuck hurtQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterLOL when I first saw the punch I thought it was nothing but Dirrell was seriously hurt. Now I am not sure if it was that particular punch that caused him the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44@Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterDirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Remember Eubank v Dan Sherry and the back header?
all that twitching on the floor
its the kind of twitching kids do when they are pretending to be dead
being a boxing fan i've seen plenty of people knocked out and I know the difference between being knocked out and doing some ridiculous acting job
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you now?
that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurateQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterBloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
You thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurateQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterBloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I neverQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterYou thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurateQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterBloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
Yet Tyson knocked him out in 5 and 3 rounds. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I neverQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterYou thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurateQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterBloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterYet Tyson knocked him out in 5 and 3 rounds. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I neverQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterYou thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurateQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterBloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
everyone had a bogeyman
Lewis had 2
just so happened Bruno had Tyson
:)
just like Ross loves Tyson Fury and no matter what you say he will always be the greatest fighter that ever lived, and as lyle loves wlad and no matter what you say all wlads holding was completely legit (coz the ref didn't call it), ive got Bruno :)
....if Bruno knew how to hold maybe he would have been a bit better :-XQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterYet Tyson knocked him out in 5 and 3 rounds. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I neverQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterYou thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurateQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterBloody auto correct. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that sentence isn't accurateQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
everyone had a bogeyman
Lewis had 2
just so happened Bruno had Tyson
:)
just like Ross loves Tyson Fury and no matter what you say he will always be the greatest fighter that ever lived, and as lyle loves wlad and no matter what you say all wlads holding was completely legit (coz the ref didn't call it), ive got Bruno :)