You shouldda retired years ago bernard you bum.
Joes gonna beat you blue and knock your sorry self out.
You shouldda retired years ago bernard you bum.
Joes gonna beat you blue and knock your sorry self out.
Seanie I know your passionate about stuff, and I should put out that I'm not a Hopkins fan and I don't think he'll win, but calling someone who has achieved what Hopkins as 'a bum' is wrong and shows a lack of knowledge for what you're talking about, so you're getting some bad rep from me.
Maybe if Joe had grown a pair a couple of years back we wouldn't be thinking Hopkins is past his best and maybe Calzaghe can beat him.
if hopkins is a bum that means calzaghe is fighting yet another bum ?
a fighter who has achieved what hopkins has cannot be a bum.
i do agree on one of the things you said though, i feel he should of stayed retired after the tarver fight
by the way bad rep for a stupid post
I dont rate hopkins at all. He beat fat welterweights and lost twice to pitty patty Taylor and weve all seen how bad taylor really was.
Hopkins could have boxed CALZAGHE years ago but bottled it.
All this fight is is one last payday for Hopkins retirement.
Joe will destroy him.
the taylor decisions were two close fights that could of gone either way, ( i felt hopkins won the second fight). the fat welterweights you were talking about i'm guessing is tito and de la hoya, i'm sure at the time they couldn't make 147 anymore so them being natural welters is wrong.
another thing you should never count hopkins out ever
Its funny you can't bad rep people because you have 0 power your rep is that bad...about sums up your opinion there dosn't it.
"It wasn't the night of the jab"
I don't see how Taylor is pitty patty or how you can say how bad he was or is. Calzaghe does not strike me as a Thomas Hearns either when it comes to punching power, but he has proved that punching power does not matter.
I think Taylor fought his heart out in his last two fights and lost them, but gave a good account of himself in both. Does that make him a bum also?
I think Hopkins will lose to Joe, but I also think he will give a good account of himself even though his best days are behind him. He is very smart and what he lacks in youth, he will make up in experience.
Last edited by Deanrw; 02-29-2008 at 01:33 PM.
Picking a fights one thing,all well and good. But Seanie,thats just f!!!ng short sighted.
Bernard is definately not a bum bro, look at what hes done. Now Joe may beat hopkins but I'm pretty damn sure he isn't going to knock him out, even at the ripe old age of forty something hopkins has to much experience.
Seanie are you that Irish pillock from Big Brother? He was 'wacky' was well.
"Old Slapper Joe" won't be KO'ing anybody, he'll win on points![]()
WHAT'S GANNIN ON!,,,Hopkins IS NOT RATED??There bold words to say about a legend like him.Mind you im a Calzaghe fan through "n" through,but i just cant see him knocking out Hopkins like!I just feel that Joe has'nt got the punch power to do so.I mean when was the last time Calzaghe sent someone to the canvas?It's been a while has'nt it?He'll beat Hopkins to the punch i reckon so thats why i've come to the conclusion that he'll win by points.GO ON JOE!!![]()
Last edited by yvonne; 02-29-2008 at 05:07 PM.
WHY IS IT THAT ALL THE IDIOTS IN THIS FORUM HAVE NO REPS /NO PICTURE OF THEMSELVES / NO PROFILE / DONT QUOTE THEIR DATE OF BIRTH
If you think Hopkins is a bum then why is Calzaghe fighting him ?
And Tarver and Winky who Hopkins defeated are both better than anything Calzaghe has even fought !!!
YOUR EITHER A KID OR A JERK .
WHO AGREES WITH ME![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks