My list im not including really old boxers from the SRR's era.
Mike McCallum
Michael Nunn
James Toney
Roy Jones Jr
Herol Graham
Thomas Hearns
Michael Watson
Gerald McClellan
Just a quick list.
My list im not including really old boxers from the SRR's era.
Mike McCallum
Michael Nunn
James Toney
Roy Jones Jr
Herol Graham
Thomas Hearns
Michael Watson
Gerald McClellan
Just a quick list.
A prime Roy is too much for anyone to handle IMO at 160-175 over last 20 years. Toney has a shot, but there are so many ifs/buts/couldn't be assed training thing with him that JC outworks him 8 fights out of 10.
p4p I rate Mike Mccallum above JC, rate him really high, but his best weight was below 168 and JC gets the nod.
Hearns nowhere near joe's level at 168 IMO, goes for Watson as well. G-man would be a barnburner (against a younger version of Joe), but I'd pick Joe to win again 8 out of 10 since he always finds a way to win in a tough fight, which is a quality he has that rarely gets appreciated, you can try and quantify and compare fighter's hand speed, power, chin, stamina, whatever- botton line is Joe is a winner.
Les Darcy would have slaughtered him.
“If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize.” Muhammad Ali.
I agree its an intersting thought, but apart from Roy who was truly special there is no one on that list who you could say with out doubt whould have destroyed JC at SM some good fights thoughA prime Roy is too much for anyone to handle IMO at 160-175 over last 20 years. Toney has a shot, but there are so many ifs/buts/couldn't be assed training thing with him that JC outworks him 8 fights out of 10.
p4p I rate Mike Mccallum above JC, rate him really high, but his best weight was below 168 and JC gets the nod.
Hearns nowhere near joe's level at 168 IMO, goes for Watson as well. G-man would be a barnburner (against a younger version of Joe), but I'd pick Joe to win again 8 out of 10 since he always finds a way to win in a tough fight, which is a quality he has that rarely gets appreciated, you can try and quantify and compare fighter's hand speed, power, chin, stamina, whatever- botton line is Joe is a winner.
"There is no point being alive if you cannot do the deadlift."
John Paul Sigmarrsson, 4 time Word's Strongest Man
Hidden Content
Now that Calzaghe is fighting at light heavy, you can add Evander Holyfield, Michael Spinks, Dwight Muhammed Qawi, Eddie Mustafa Muhammed, Matthew Saad Muhammed
Those ones for sure.
If you include probablies, you can add Yaqui Lopez, John Conteh, Marvin Johnson, Victor Galindez, James Scott.
I'm sure there are others.
Chris eubank in his prime
James Toney
Roy Jones
Robin Reid i think Robin did beat him first time he deserved rematch
Nigel Benn in his prime
Herol graham
Thomas Hearns
Sugar ray leonard
Bernard Hopkins in his prime
Steve collins
Glenn Johnson
The G man
I could probably think of more just a few off top of my head.
If were talking prime 2002-2005 Calzaghe at 168lbs only Roy Jones, Hopkins would get beat worse than the old version as he would try to fight Calzaghe and get pasted and again wins over tito and Oscar cannot possibly lead me to believe he beats Joe.
The rest Joe would box their heads off.
err Herol Graham ? Dont think so...
People so hard on Calzaghe ,
Thats cricket
It would depend on the weight and period. This thread is too random. At 168 Calzaghe has a chance against anyone.
Not a well thought out thread.
Well remember that Joe fought most of his career @ 168, under the new weigh-in rules. Joe's talked about how tough it was to make 168, so mos tlikely he'd be a light-heavyweight under the day-of-the-fight weigh in procedures.
There's quite a few light-heavyweights I'd pick over him (Foster, Spinks, Qawi to name a few). Of the more recent fighters, I'd pick a prime Roy over Calzaghe. Probably Toney at 168 as well. And the Hopkins of the late 90s/early 00s. I don't picture Hopkins having too much trouble going up one weight class to 168. Even though he made 160 rather easily, he was always a physically strong guy.
I don't like Hearns and Leonard's chances that much. They were too small and not the same fighters they had been when they fought around the 168-175 range (SRL had some help with the weight and the WBC for those titles).
Maybe the Hearns of the mid 80s that went to light-heavy wins over Joe. I don't think the 1991-92 version wins though.
Last edited by Thread Stealer; 06-27-2008 at 04:39 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks