Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: why the hate

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1068
    Cool Clicks

    Default why the hate

    why the hate for david haye, especially the few british lads on here givin him stick. i thought he fought the perfect fight, yeah it was boring, but he did what he had too do, those on here that say valuev won it are absolutely crazy. a boxing fight first and foremost is scored on shots landed, that is the primary scoring system(check the rules) and aggresion and all that shit is secondary.but first and foremost its shots landed. haye outland valuev easily, and scored the most eye catching punches, yeah haye was on the back foot, but how else did u expect haye too beat valuev, ive sat silently for a while just wathing peoples posts about the fight, and people who i thought knew boxing that are sayin valuev won the fight must not no shit, not naming names. haye won that fight with ease, he made valuev look so ordinary its unreal(which we no he is,many have tried and most have failed). i no now that im gonna get some mixed replies from this thread, but im more than happy too answer, WELL DONE DAVID HAYE, WE NEED A FIGHTER LIKE U FOR THE SAKE OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, GOD BLESS U

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1173
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    I've not even seen the fight so I can't comment on that. People are hating on haye tho because he made it his business to talk shit about wladimir for doing "what he has to" and not fighting in wild exciting fights, difference is even with that style wladimir still knocks his foes out. Haye is simply a shit talker and hypocrite, and people often times do not admire those qualities, simple as, even if it's just an act to sell tickets.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

    It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

    And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

    Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

    Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

    Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

    I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

    It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

    Valuev is a garbage fighter.

    John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1068
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

    It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

    And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

    Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

    Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

    Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

    I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

    It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

    Valuev is a garbage fighter.

    John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

    It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

    And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

    Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

    Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

    Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

    I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

    It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

    Valuev is a garbage fighter.

    John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
    Haye won quite comfortably. The art (or science) of boxing is to hit your opponent and not be hit yourself. That is exactly what Haye did to Valuev!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

    It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

    And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

    Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

    Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

    Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

    I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

    It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

    Valuev is a garbage fighter.

    John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    I should also say as well that many commentators, ringside observers and the crowd also believe Larry Donald clearly beat Valuev, although I have not seen that fight to confirm.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

    It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

    And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

    Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

    Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

    Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

    I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

    It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

    Valuev is a garbage fighter.

    John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
    Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
    Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.
    Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

    Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

    Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

    By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related

    Let's make that 5 fights he's lost.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
    Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.
    Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

    Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

    Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

    By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related

    Let's make that 5 fights he's lost.
    What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

    Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post

    Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.
    Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

    Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

    Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

    By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related
    Let's make that 5 fights he's lost.
    What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

    Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World.
    I'm not even sure he gets past John Ruiz.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1068
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

    It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

    And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

    Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

    Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

    Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

    I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

    It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

    Valuev is a garbage fighter.

    John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
    im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

    Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

    Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

    By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related
    Let's make that 5 fights he's lost.
    What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

    Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World.
    I'm not even sure he gets past John Ruiz.
    Ok then Dildo.... erm i mean Bilbo, I'll have you a sig bet on the Haye Ruiz fight. I'm having Haye by the way.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3362
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
    im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate
    We will see, the 'reality' is that Haye pulled out of a fight with Wlad, thne Vitali. He made his name calling them out and then smartly cancelled on them and went after the division's David Diaz to get his belt.

    When he fights Wlad he will be dismantled and chopped down as one sidedly and predictably as any of Wlad's last 8 or 9 opponents.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: why the hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

    When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

    Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

    All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

    If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

    He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

    Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
    im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate
    We will see, the 'reality' is that Haye pulled out of a fight with Wlad, thne Vitali. He made his name calling them out and then smartly cancelled on them and went after the division's David Diaz to get his belt.

    When he fights Wlad he will be dismantled and chopped down as one sidedly and predictably as any of Wlad's last 8 or 9 opponents.
    Personally I think he will be dismantled and chopped down in the same manner as Brewster was in their first fight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. I Hate This
    By Trainer Monkey in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-08-2008, 01:51 AM
  2. Hate Letter
    By brucelee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-17-2008, 03:28 AM
  3. Does anyone else HATE this..
    By RP33 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-05-2008, 03:11 PM
  4. Saying/expressions you hate
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 01:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing