Froch v Kessler - challenge

[erics44]

Just watched froch v kessler again and i had it 117-113 to froch

biast i hear you shouting, i dont think so

i challenge to to watch it again, turn the sound down, try and forget how you feel about the fighters and score it as honest as posible

[HattonTheHammer]

Just watched froch v kessler again and i had it 117-113 to froch

biast i hear you shouting, i dont think so

i challenge to to watch it again, turn the sound down, try and forget how you feel about the fighters and score it as honest as posible

mate asking these lot to score a carl froch fight without any biased is like asking gary glitter to babysit for you

PS:117-113?? you should never score a round 10-10 mate, makes the whole process inadequate

[erics44]

Just watched froch v kessler again and i had it 117-113 to froch

biast i hear you shouting, i dont think so

i challenge to to watch it again, turn the sound down, try and forget how you feel about the fighters and score it as honest as posible

mate asking these lot to score a carl froch fight without any biased is like asking gary glitter to babysit for you

PS:117-113?? you should never score a round 10-10 mate, makes the whole process inadequate

i think i scored 2 rounds 10-10 and that was coz a couple were close and i hadnt given kessler anything

if im not allowed to score them 10 10 then i my card would be 117-111

p.s how did you score round 11 to kes? that and 5 kes looked in trouble

[HattonTheHammer]

Just watched froch v kessler again and i had it 117-113 to froch

biast i hear you shouting, i dont think so

i challenge to to watch it again, turn the sound down, try and forget how you feel about the fighters and score it as honest as posible

mate asking these lot to score a carl froch fight without any biased is like asking gary glitter to babysit for you

PS:117-113?? you should never score a round 10-10 mate, makes the whole process inadequate

i think i scored 2 rounds 10-10 and that was coz a couple were close and i hadnt given kessler anything

if im not allowed to score them 10 10 then i my card would be 117-111

p.s how did you score round 11 to kes? that and 5 kes looked in trouble

10-10 is for idiots like jim watt who has absolutely not a single grain of fathom of how to score a boxing contest

i gave 11 to kess mate because i thought super carl was blowing a bit and getting tired. But so would you if youve just pummelled the home town hero for the last 10rounds

[erics44]

watch 11 again and tell me what you think

[ICB]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

[erics44]

what isnt?

[Gandalf]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

He didn't did he?

I supported Froch, but thought he lost a competitive fight. Only seen it twice and didn't score it.

[HattonTheHammer]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

He didn't did he?

I supported Froch, but thought he lost a competitive fight. Only seen it twice and didn't score it.

From someone who has seen it a dozen or so times and scored it on every single occasion let me assure you, FROCH WON

[ICB]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

He didn't did he?

I supported Froch, but thought he lost a competitive fight. Only seen it twice and didn't score it.

Oh yea he did trust me look in the other thread, he had it 115-113 for John Ruiz. He also had Joe Frazier ahead going into the last round vs Muhammad Ali, in there 3rd fight.

I mean honestly WTF, these can't be serious scores can they ? and in what part of the fight did Carl Froch whoop Mikkel Kessler ?

It actually pisses me off, when a person keeps claiming lies. I mean no one else i've seen on any boxing forum, had Carl Froch winning.

I mean i can understand Ono thinking Carl Froch maybe edged it. Although i personally don't understand how he did, but still thats reasonable enough.

But a 4 point or wider win for Carl Froch, is just fucking a joke. Considering 90 percent of boxing fans feel Mikkel Kessler won by atleast 2 rounds or more, but then again were all wrong and HTH is right because he's Saddo legend.

Give me a fucking break.

[HattonTheHammer]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

He didn't did he?

I supported Froch, but thought he lost a competitive fight. Only seen it twice and didn't score it.

Oh yea he did trust me look in the other thread, he had it 115-113 for John Ruiz. He also had Joe Frazier ahead going into the last round vs Muhammad Ali, in there 3rd fight.

I mean honestly WTF, these can't be serious scores can they ? and in what part of the fight did Carl Froch whoop Mikkel Kessler ?

It actually pisses me off, when a person keeps claiming lies. I mean no one else i've seen on any boxing forum, had Carl Froch winning.

I mean i can understand Ono thinking Carl Froch maybe edged it. Although i personally don't understand how he did, but still thats reasonable enough.

But a 4 point or wider win for Carl Froch, is just fucking a joke. Considering 90 percent of boxing fans feel Mikkel Kessler won by atleast 2 rounds or more, but then again were all wrong and HTH is right because he's Saddo legend.

Give me a fucking break.

ruiz-jones - every single fricking time jones landed the crowd would go wild everytime ruiz hit jones not a thing was said. The whole spectacle was created for a middleweight to become heavyweight champ of the world but in reality jones flurries were few and far between and the majority of the fight was dominated by ruiz 115-113 ruiz

Ali-frazier 3 - you honestly telling me that wasnt a close fight?

froch-kessler - many well respected journalists claim froch got a rough deal, does that make them "liars"?? as ive rightfully pointed too plenty of times over when youve seen a fight over and over again you have the right to state who won it. Froch won end of story

[erics44]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

He didn't did he?

I supported Froch, but thought he lost a competitive fight. Only seen it twice and didn't score it.

watch it again dude

kessler doesnt land a meaningful punch till the 6th

a couple of close early rounds which froch lands more punches, then by the 5th it looks like froch is gonna walk it, then kessler has a couple of good rounds, probly his best of the fight and in the 8th froch starts to get back on top, in the 11th kessler looks completely gone

someone laughed in the other thread because hth scored the 8th to kessler, i dont see whats funny, kes landed 1 punch in the round, all be it his best of the fight, but you dont win a round off one punch

[ICB]

Wow

But then again atleast its not as bad, as HTH having John Ruiz beating Roy Jones.

He didn't did he?

I supported Froch, but thought he lost a competitive fight. Only seen it twice and didn't score it.

watch it again dude

kessler doesnt land a meaningful punch till the 6th

a couple of close early rounds which froch lands more punches, then by the 5th it looks like froch is gonna walk it, then kessler has a couple of good rounds, probly his best of the fight and in the 8th froch starts to get back on top, in the 11th kessler looks completely gone

someone laughed in the other thread because hth scored the 8th to kessler, i dont see whats funny, kes landed 1 punch in the round, all be it his best of the fight, but you dont win a round off one punch

Whats the point of watching it again ? it wasn't that controversial that it needs repeated viewing's. A majority of the boxing fans had Mikkel Kessler winning by atleast 2 or 3 rounds.

And Carl Froch never whooped anyone, and he never looked like walking it. I think you need to take those glasses off, you and your mate HTH. Because your both making yourself look silly.

I mean do you think a majority of boxing fans having Mikkel Kessler, as the winner is all because we have some sort of vendetta against Carl Froch ? what about the other British fans having Mikkel Kessler winning ? most of the British fans had Mikkel Kessler as the winner.

He was the aggressor, he had the better workrate. He landed a good steady amount of punches to the body and head. And if it was on the line going into the 12th round, Mikkel Kessler pulled it out and was a clear winning by a few rounds.

Now im just watching round 8 now, and i'll talk you through what im seeing. I see Carl Froch pocking out slow jabs not landing, Mikkel Kessler coming forward and throwing not landing many, but he is the aggressor and all Carl Froch is doing is backing up throwing slow jabs which are not landing. Mikkel Kessler lands a big right hand 56 seconds to go in the round, that staggers Carl Froch. Mikkel Kessler goes to the body and head. He's got Carl Froch up against the ropes, two jabs and a right hand from Mikkel Kessler.

Again a clear round for Mikkel Kessler, Carl Froch done nothing in that round. Mikkel Kessler was the one coming forward, he threw more punches. Landed the best punch of the round, and he had Carl Froch up against the ropes at the end of the round. So just explain how you had Carl Froch winning that round ?

[erics44]

Whats the point of watching it again ? it wasn't that controversial that it needs repeated viewing's. A majority of the boxing fans had Mikkel Kessler winning by atleast 2 or 3 rounds.

I have just watched it and i dont believe anyone who knows anything about boxing could have kessler as much as drawing the fight

i watched it at the time drunk, listening to the commentry and i thought it was close and could have gone either way, it wasnt, froch won and it wasnt close

after watching it i would say kesslers best days are behind him, he wasnt competative for much of the fight

[erics44]

also dude froch wasnt staggered, that one punch kes landed in round 8 was his best of the fight and froch was slightly off ballance

you are either watching the fight through froch hating glasses or you cant admit you are wrong