Whats the point of watching it again ? it wasn't that controversial that it needs repeated viewing's. A majority of the boxing fans had Mikkel Kessler winning by atleast 2 or 3 rounds.
And Carl Froch never whooped anyone, and he never looked like walking it. I think you need to take those glasses off, you and your mate HTH. Because your both making yourself look silly.
I mean do you think a majority of boxing fans having Mikkel Kessler, as the winner is all because we have some sort of vendetta against Carl Froch ? what about the other British fans having Mikkel Kessler winning ? most of the British fans had Mikkel Kessler as the winner.
He was the aggressor, he had the better workrate. He landed a good steady amount of punches to the body and head. And if it was on the line going into the 12th round, Mikkel Kessler pulled it out and was a clear winning by a few rounds.
Now im just watching round 8 now, and i'll talk you through what im seeing. I see Carl Froch pocking out slow jabs not landing, Mikkel Kessler coming forward and throwing not landing many, but he is the aggressor and all Carl Froch is doing is backing up throwing slow jabs which are not landing. Mikkel Kessler lands a big right hand 56 seconds to go in the round, that staggers Carl Froch. Mikkel Kessler goes to the body and head. He's got Carl Froch up against the ropes, two jabs and a right hand from Mikkel Kessler.
Again a clear round for Mikkel Kessler, Carl Froch done nothing in that round. Mikkel Kessler was the one coming forward, he threw more punches. Landed the best punch of the round, and he had Carl Froch up against the ropes at the end of the round. So just explain how you had Carl Froch winning that round ?
Bookmarks