I am not for obese peoples needing to pay because for many obese, it's either a genetics question or the case of a bad education on the matter: Sure, eating bacon and burgers aren't good, but there is also other insidious things that can make you become fat, like eating many feculents in one single meal but many peoples ignore it and biologically talking, some are more vulnerable to it than some others.
Now, how to split up the one responsible from the one who are obese because of a bad education or because of genetics/thyroid problems? Will we make an investigation on each one of them to prove who has to pay and who has not?
As for those smoking, the thing is that it's a very complicated issue globally:
- Peoples before were almost all smoking because it was considering cool and because nobody knew how bad it was (and at the time, it wasn't as toxic as today). Shall we make pay those who were uninformed about the problem as well? How do we split up the limit with proofs here?
- Passive smokers: What do we do with peoples who are working in bars or place where there is massive amount of smoke? They know it's dangerous but still chose to work there, shall we make them pay as well as they did chose that kind of life? What about kids? What about kids when they grow up who would have been the object of passive smoke from their parents?
- Some peoples might be pre-destined to have a lung cancer, smokers or not. IT is very possible that some smokers get lung cancer but not because they were smoking, in that case, isn't it discriminatory to make them pay if we can't prove that it's officially smoking that did cause that cancer?
These are some issues I have with that idea, perhaps a solution would be to ask a bit more on peoples life insurance who are smoking, nothing outrageous but a little something in order to help cover the global expenses related with it but I am absolutely not in favor to make pay obese peoples in general and to another extend, the smokers issue is quite complicated too.
Bookmarks