Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.
-
Boxrec RULES!!!!
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us. -
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
holy crap! they really do and actually have him above Hatton. how is this possible??
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
i don't even talk about it anymore, because boxrec's rankings are ALWAYS wayyy off.. they work on some sort of point system i believe, but it's horrible..
-
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
That's what I usually do too, but this was so off I actually lol'ed.
Originally Posted by RP33
I don't understand how even a computer run point system could figure that.For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us. -
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
Thats is a insult to Hatton, Pac has never fought at 140 yet!
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
Originally Posted by littlebif
not only to Hatton mate but the whole 140 division...
the hell with their ratings.. they should stick to recording wins and losses.. -
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
Boxrtec rankings have always been known for being a joke to put it nicely
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
Great for 2 thngs..
1 a fighters record and upcoming scheduale
2. a good laugh now and againHidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!! -
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA... Originally Posted by killersheep
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.Last edited by XaduBoxer; 12-20-2008 at 12:00 AM.
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!! Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA... Originally Posted by killersheep
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us. -
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit Originally Posted by killersheep
Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!! Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA... Originally Posted by killersheep
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.
That's why we have weight divisions...
At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.Last edited by XaduBoxer; 12-20-2008 at 01:35 AM.
-
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
FAIL, EPIC FAIL............. Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit Originally Posted by killersheep
Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!! Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
. That's why we have weight divisions...
At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us. -
Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!
That's all... Why not say something why it fails? Just like how I illustrate why Klitscho can't be #1 in all weight divisions... Originally Posted by killersheep
FAIL, EPIC FAIL............. Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit Originally Posted by killersheep
That's why we have weight divisions...
At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.
.
