Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    The thread on the p4p rankings from Ring Magazine has me asking this question and also that it's owned by Golden Boy Enterprises which promotes boxers.

    First off the thread on the latest p4p rankings also has me questioning the selections like Donaire in it and guys like Dawson and Williams are left out, especially Williams who has fought and won all of his fights at 3 weight classes, with only 1 defeat which he avenged.

    But I think that the magazine is owned by GBP which promotes boxers is a major conflict of interest. I really don't think a company that promotes fights/boxers should be owning the Ring Magazine which has so called credible ratings and is considered to be an authoritative source within the boxing community. How do we know things like ratings/rankings won't be manipulated?

    Your thoughts?
    Last edited by generalbulldog; 06-17-2009 at 04:36 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    What does it matter if the ratings are manipulated? It's just a magazine. Who would that favour?

    Their ratings/rankings are just as rubbish as every other. They poll the OPINION of so-called experts, but all rankings are flawed and hypocritical.

    IF their ratings guarantee title shots, and therefore big money oppotunities, then I guess it would be important.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    Ring rating has always been corrupt even before they got associated with GBP. They say they're the bible in boxing. But which bible?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    There are only 3 GBP boxers in the Ring Top 10, Juan Manuel Marquez, Bernard Hopkins & Shane Mosley, all of whom get in to almost all fans' top 10. There's a lot to criticize about GBP but manipulating Ring Magazine is not one of them.

    However, in truth their rankings are just as open to being abused by idiotic choices as our own are

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    There are only 3 GBP boxers in the Ring Top 10, Juan Manuel Marquez, Bernard Hopkins & Shane Mosley, all of whom get in to almost all fans' top 10. There's a lot to criticize about GBP but manipulating Ring Magazine is not one of them.

    However, in truth their rankings are just as open to being abused by idiotic choices as our own are
    I guess that's a good way of looking at it. It's still a big conflict of interest for me with it being own by GBP, since Ring magazine is seen as an "authoritative" publication in the boxing world with it's Ring titles and that sort of stuff and p4p rankings and being quoted by lots of people for credibility.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Crawley, West Sussex
    Posts
    4,253
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1192
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    Ratings are personal opinions....

    Think of it like this:

    There are perhaps 100 Junior Welterweights in Britain alone, so maybe there are at least 1500 active 140lbers in the World?

    And somehow a panel of experts have watched all these fighters, discussed and come to a consensus on the ten best, and placed them from one though to ten.....

    Pound for pound there must be at least 12,000 active pro's weighing between what 100 and 400lbs? Yet every month this panel can come to an opinion on the ten best if they all weighed the same?

    Even the best ratings are opinions, and the best ratings are your opinions!
    "Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."

    George Foreman

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    There are only 3 GBP boxers in the Ring Top 10, Juan Manuel Marquez, Bernard Hopkins & Shane Mosley, all of whom get in to almost all fans' top 10. There's a lot to criticize about GBP but manipulating Ring Magazine is not one of them.

    However, in truth their rankings are just as open to being abused by idiotic choices as our own are
    I guess that's a good way of looking at it. It's still a big conflict of interest for me with it being own by GBP, since Ring magazine is seen as an "authoritative" publication in the boxing world with it's Ring titles and that sort of stuff and p4p rankings and being quoted by lots of people for credibility.
    My understanding was ODLH bought it as part of a plan to use it to revive public interest in boxing. The way that GBP fighters have come to monopolize HBO schedules is far more of a concern to me than the Ring thing, which as far as I can tell they have stuck to their word & stayed out of editorial decisions.

  8. #8
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: How credible is Ring Magazine and it's ratings?

    Well The Ring Champions are as follows:

    Heavyweight: the winner of Wladimir Klitschko (IBF, WBO) vs Ruslan Chagaev (WBA)
    Cruiserweight: Tomaz Adamek
    Light Heavyweight: Joe Calzaghe/VACANT
    Super Middleweight: Joe Calzaghe/VACANT
    Middleweight: Kelly Pavlik
    Jr. Middleweight: VACANT
    Welterweight: Floyd Mayweather Jr./VACANT
    Jr. Welterweight: Manny Pacquiao
    Lightweight: Juan Manuel Marquez

    You guys have issues with any of those

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. New Ring Magazine Rankings
    By C-Lo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-04-2008, 06:23 PM
  2. New ring ratings out
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-30-2008, 01:32 AM
  3. New Ring Magazine
    By DAVIDTUA in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-23-2008, 09:57 PM
  4. Ring Magazine Top 100
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 11-15-2007, 01:44 AM
  5. new RING ratings
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-18-2007, 05:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing