Boxing: HBO: Klitschkos confuse fans
Are you fucking kidding me? Are people really that stupid? I have a very hard time believe this is why they won't televise the Klitschko - Chambers fight.
Boxing: HBO: Klitschkos confuse fans
Are you fucking kidding me? Are people really that stupid? I have a very hard time believe this is why they won't televise the Klitschko - Chambers fight.
that's because fighters like that tend to be safety first.
how is it contradicting? one thing I would say about Wlad is that he's aptly named Dr.Steelhammer.
take the tony thompson fight. a horrible fight completely devoid of any skill from either fighter. Wlad ends it with a single punch.
he saps his opponents' strength when he holds. he even jabs to set up clinches. he doesn't throw uppercuts because it leaves him open. he doesn't even step in to throw lefthooks because that leaves him open. wlad right now is the definition of a safety first fighter.
Same was said about Larry Holmes and Lennox Lewis and basically anyone that's not Mike Tyson. I've heard it about everyone and really the people that believe Wlad is boring are the people that don't understand how difficult it actually is to be that dominant of a fighter. Could Wlad add some flash and some danger to his style? Sure, but why would he handicap himself? Nobody would have asked Tyson to fight like Willie Pep.
The reason the fight isn't being shown in the US is because the US has a lack of respect for the heavyweight division because the average "sports fan" doesn't think there are any Americans in the hunt for the title, and that's very disrespectful to guys like Eddie Chambers whom although may be a pudgey cruiserweight he's very skilled and he should have earned some respect.
But make no doubt about it the Klitschko's are a big deal in Europe and Wlad will have asses in the seats on Saturday.
Don Steinberg on ESPN.com said "Klitschko is 14-2 with 12 KOs in title fights. It sounds exciting, but the fights have been dreary. (Against Ray Austin in 2007, Klitschko won by TKO in Round 2 without ever throwing a right hand.)"
Yeah...."dreary"...that describes the Austin fight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO_sWnawpU4
I'm sorry that KO is pretty well worth the time they spent "feeling each other out". Wlad showed a solid jab and good defense up until the KO but it just shows you when Wlad knows he can finish someone he does it. His fight with Calvin Brock was also pretty good as well.
Most of the people that hate on Wlad either have another heavyweight they like or they don't want to admit that Wlad has top notch boxing skill despite having flaws that would have derailed the careers of lesser skilled fighters.
Notice that boxing goes into a funk in AMerica when the HW champ is not exciting? Americans expect the HW champ to be a Dempsey, Marciano, ALi, Tyson, Holyfield, etc. An exciting champ, not some robotic cautious pawing giant. I think Larry Merchant put it best when he said, "Boxing is drama and theater." I see no drama or theater with Wlad. And a lot of people would agree with me on that, not just the casual fight fan but amongst hardcore followers of the sport.
At first I thought it was the American thing, but Pacquiao ain't American he doesn't seem to have a problem bringing people to Cowboys stadium or people paying to see his PPVs doesn't he? And he's not a HW but a WW.
In that ring article I posted on page 1, Goosen makes a good point in that if Wlad was an exciting HW champ he would be all over tv, times square, etc. But the truth of the matter he's not exciting. And really I don't think him not being American has anything to do with it.
Luckily for Wlad fans, you can see his entire career on video as it has been implemented in this piece of literature:
http://www.healthyguides.net/photo/I...Remedies_s.jpg
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks