Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Who won, Sturm or Macklin?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    552
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    894
    Cool Clicks

    Default Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Simple poll, it will give a more true opinion of the Saddo community if only people vote on the poll who scored the fight properly round by round as the fight progressed. Thats how fights are scored by the judges ringside so thats how we should score it too.

    I had it 118-110 Macklin, I only gave Sturm rounds 10 and 12 and I thought it was a disgusting decision. I want to know if my opinion is bakced up or refuted by the fans in the know.
    Last edited by J_C; 06-26-2011 at 12:22 AM.
    maineventboxing.wordpress.com - my mates boxing blog, check it out for fight articles and fight predictions

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3374
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    It was a very close and competitive fight. 118-110 Macklin would certainly have been a disgusting decision imo. He fought well and outworked Sturm, especially early, but all the accurate and powerful shots came from Sturm and he finished well on top imo. I thought Macklin was really fading down the stretch although it was still very close as I felt Macklin had built up an early lead. But for me the superior fighter got the decision. He started slowly, but got into the fight as the rounds went on and he was blocking most of Macklin's output. I imagine the punch stats probably show Macklin throwing several hundred more but only landing the same as Sturm. Certainly Sturm landed all the eye catching stuff. He got the nod in his home town and I didn't see it as any more controversial than Froch-Dirrell, or Kessler-Froch. just a very close (and good) fight that went to the defending champion in his home country, the way close fights usually do.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3374
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm
    The last couple rounds I thought Macklin was going to get knocked out. He may have built up lead by punching Sturms gloves and arms a lot but if you are scoring boxing and accurate punches landed, damage done etc it's hard to argue against a Sturm win imo.

    It was clearly going Sturm's way by the end of the 12th and so he deserved to keep his belt. Gallant effort from Macklin but I believe you have to take the title from the champion and as he was almost out on his feet by the end clearly he didn't do that. Good effort though.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm
    The last couple rounds I thought Macklin was going to get knocked out. He may have built up lead by punching Sturms gloves and arms a lot but if you are scoring boxing and accurate punches landed, damage done etc it's hard to argue against a Sturm win imo.

    It was clearly going Sturm's way by the end of the 12th and so he deserved to keep his belt. Gallant effort from Macklin but I believe you have to take the title from the champion and as he was almost out on his feet by the end clearly he didn't do that. Good effort though.
    Well said. Macklin was certainly the busier fighter. And he won some rounds by pretty much out working Felix. But pretty much all the best punches were landed by Sturm. I give Mack credit. He was game. He fought a good fight. Should leave the sport on this high note.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    94
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm
    The last couple rounds I thought Macklin was going to get knocked out. He may have built up lead by punching Sturms gloves and arms a
    lot but if you are scoring boxing and accurate punches landed, damage done etc it's hard to argue against a
    Sturm win imo.
    It was clearly going Sturm's way by the end of the 12th and so he deserved to keep his belt. Gallant
    effort from Macklin but I believe you have to take the title from the champion and as he was almost out on his feet by the end clearly he didn't do that. Good effort though.
    Totally agree, although Sturm never won it by 4 rounds tho - you have to do more to take the champs title wherever the fight is. Brings me on to Haye / VT - he's gonna have to knock him out methinks - can't wait!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3126
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm
    The last couple rounds I thought Macklin was going to get knocked out. He may have built up lead by punching Sturms gloves and arms a lot but if you are scoring boxing and accurate punches landed, damage done etc it's hard to argue against a Sturm win imo.

    It was clearly going Sturm's way by the end of the 12th and so he deserved to keep his belt. Gallant effort from Macklin but I believe you have to take the title from the champion and as he was almost out on his feet by the end clearly he didn't do that. Good effort though.
    That's the most pathetic notion in boxing.

    The champion doesn't get a head start. He fights under the exact same rules as the challenger. If you are naturally favouring the belt holder your scoring is clearly flawed/worthless.

    And if you think Macklin was hitting just gloves and arms, checkout the left side of Sturms body. It was red raw after just a few rounds.
    Last edited by Fenster; 06-26-2011 at 10:31 AM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm
    The last couple rounds I thought Macklin was going to get knocked out. He may have built up lead by punching Sturms gloves and arms a lot but if you are scoring boxing and accurate punches landed, damage done etc it's hard to argue against a Sturm win imo.

    It was clearly going Sturm's way by the end of the 12th and so he deserved to keep his belt. Gallant effort from Macklin but I believe you have to take the title from the champion and as he was almost out on his feet by the end clearly he didn't do that. Good effort though.
    That's the most pathetic notion in boxing.

    The champion doesn't get a head start. He fights under the exact same rules as the challenger. If you are naturally favouring the belt holder your scoring is clearly flawed/worthless.
    Yeah i've never understood that. It's like giving Barcelona a 1 goal head-start.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3374
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm
    The last couple rounds I thought Macklin was going to get knocked out. He may have built up lead by punching Sturms gloves and arms a lot but if you are scoring boxing and accurate punches landed, damage done etc it's hard to argue against a Sturm win imo.

    It was clearly going Sturm's way by the end of the 12th and so he deserved to keep his belt. Gallant effort from Macklin but I believe you have to take the title from the champion and as he was almost out on his feet by the end clearly he didn't do that. Good effort though.
    That's the most pathetic notion in boxing.

    The champion doesn't get a head start. He fights under the exact same rules as the challenger. If you are naturally favouring the belt holder your scoring is clearly flawed/worthless.

    And if you think Macklin was hitting just gloves and arms, checkout the left side of Sturms body. It was red raw after just a few rounds.
    I don't literally mean that the champion should be judged differently from the challenger I'm simply being realistic regarding the subjective nature of scoring in boxing, and the influences put on the judges.

    If you are going into a champions backyard, against both him and his fans you really have to prove yourself the better fighter to get the nod. That's just the way it is. Macklin for me didn't do that. Sure he started well and was up at the halfway stage you would have to imagine but he faded down the stretch as Sturm came on.

    If you look at the fight under the following criteria I think Sturm deserved the win.

    Accurate punching and boxing skills, Sturm
    Most damaging shots, Sturm
    Who was winning and would likely have won had the fight continued, Sturm

    Now, scoring on a rbr Macklin "may" have won the fight, I didn't score rbr so can't comment. I felt Wtt's card of 114-114 apiece was about right. But looking at the flow of the fight and who "won" just by watching the overall flow of the fight I felt Sturm won it as he finished clearly on top and Macklin had very little left.

    If he would have got the nod it would been a somewhat controversial win in my eyes as I felt Strum displayed the better boxing skills, was more accurate, and beat up his opponent by the end. On a rbr maybe Macklin won more rounds if I added them up (I cannot be botherd though) but I fwlt the better boxer and true winner got the decision.

    Kind of like Matthyse's losses to Judah and Alexander but in reverse. For me he won both of those fights because he landed clearly the more hurtful shots and finished on top, looking like the boss, but rbr scoring led to him losing them both rather unjustly in my eyes.

    Sturm's result went in his favour as he's the hometown fighter and champion for sure, but I think he deserved it and would favour him again in a rematch.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    738
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I didnt think sturm won by 4rounds it was alot closer if not a macklin win imo, strum was lazy and dissapionting for all but the last few rounds, he looked like he cudnt be arsed! I think we all thought macklin stood little chance of a ko so it was gona be up to a high work rate which he achived, i agree strum threw more hurtful/powerful shots but bar the last round or so he didnt throw many, strum was very dissapointing if he'd of put the effort in like the last round he'd of probley got an early -mid fight ko,macklin was clearly up for it and did land alot of shots, probley more noticeable to the body, think mackin should hav got a draw at the very least, either way he did himself and britain proud!
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    116-112 Sturm. Fight was competitive. Most rounds were close. Still thought it was clear-cut win for Sturm

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1531
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Vey close,hard to score fight.Think Macklin nicked by a round but it could have gone the other way.

    Macklin threw and landed more but Sturms work was better and he seemed to be the stronger fighter in the last few rounds.I think if the fight lasted 20 seconds more Macklin would have been put down.


    Great fight and I dont think anybody would say no to a rematch.
    Balls

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3374
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Quote Originally Posted by porkypara View Post
    Vey close,hard to score fight.Think Macklin nicked by a round but it could have gone the other way.

    Macklin threw and landed more but Sturms work was better and he seemed to be the stronger fighter in the last few rounds.I think if the fight lasted 20 seconds more Macklin would have been put down.


    Great fight and I dont think anybody would say no to a rematch.
    Sturm will, that was way out of his comfort zone.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1442
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    Personally I thought Sturms clean effective shots won it for him in the end. After 10 rounds I had it even with Sturm taking the last 2!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    I had Macklin winning 115-113 due to his incredible work-rate throughout the first seven rounds, of which I gave him six. After that his pace understandably slowed down and Sturm came on strong with increased moments of quality but I felt Macklin had done enough after a good ninth round. The final bell certainly came at the right time for Macklin who had put so much into the fight.

    It's unbeliveable how two judges only gave him four rounds in the fight, but yet depressingly believable given the location. Given those scorecards I think it's fair to say that Macklin didn't stand a chance without the stoppage. He was never going to completely dominate Sturm for the full twelve rounds, which he seemingly required for a decision.

    At least Macklin is receiving plenty of praise for his efforts and his worldwide reputation is today enhanced despite the loss. In an ideal world I would like to see an immediate rematch but I would advise him against going back to Germany. He would need a stoppage, unlikely as Sturm looked very durable and took Macklin's pressure without wilting. No doubt Sturm would reject a rematch at a neutral venue, so I hope Macklin looks for a different route to the top, with perhaps a rematch down the line.

    Cracking fight, best I've seen so far this year. Shame about the outcome.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    357
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    851
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Sturm v Macklin - Who won?

    macklin won by clearly winning more rounds in a close fight , the best sturm could of hoped for was a home town biased draw . but instead we got a decision which does nothing to encourage boxers going to germany for a tittle fight against a german boxer
    think happy thoughts

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Sturm vs Macklin
    By TigerFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 06-27-2011, 11:16 AM
  2. Macklin vs. Sturm
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-25-2011, 09:44 PM
  3. Who you got Moore or Macklin?
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-02-2006, 12:00 PM
  4. Sturm update. Sturm knocked down in RD 2
    By Pantera in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-16-2006, 01:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing