I thought pac won - anyone want an argument or am i too late?

[erics44]

yep its true, i thought pac won the fight

couple of rounds in fact

[Mattyhitman]

your too late mate, i think that has sailed

Oh, and your wrong anyway

[FinitoElDinamita]

Matty is right.. You're too late Eric. Doesnt matter what anyone says at this point because people's minds are already made up.

Let's not beat on a dead horse. If you think Pac won, great, knock yourself out..

[erics44]

AWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE CUMMONNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!

it wasnt my fault i never watched it at the time

[FinitoElDinamita]

AWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE CUMMONNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!

it wasnt my fault i never watched it at the time

Go for it bruh, present your case.. Let's at least hear it..

[erics44]

AWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE CUMMONNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!

it wasnt my fault i never watched it at the time

Go for it bruh, present your case.. Let's at least hear it..

As you insist



It was an extremeky close fight, marquez landed the more eye catching punches and pac was pressing from start to finish

I think they did land a very similar amount of punches its just pacs pressing left him open a bit more and the punches he took caught they eye

A couple of rounds marquez won big and pac never won any rounds as clearly

But over a very even fight there were 10 very very close rounds where both fighters were landing equally, pac pipped rounds because he was significantly more agressive

[InTheNeutralCorner]

your too late mate, i think that has sailed

Oh, and your wrong anyway

I don't think any side is wrong here. Like what a poster said, BOXING SCORING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE. In a very close fight, people will be split on who to give the round to. They may try to distribute those rounds evenly on the two protagonist or they might give all of them to the boxer with the fighting style they prefer hence the huge discrepancy in some of the scorecards.

Until they come up with a better and more accurate way of scoring fights, then there will just be more of these arguments in the coming fights.

[Mars_ax]

your too late mate, i think that has sailed

Oh, and your wrong anyway

I don't think any side is wrong here. Like what a poster said, BOXING SCORING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE. In a very close fight, people will be split on who to give the round to. They may try to distribute those rounds evenly on the two protagonist or they might give all of them to the boxer with the fighting style they prefer hence the huge discrepancy in some of the scorecards.

Until they come up with a better and more accurate way of scoring fights, then there will just be more of these arguments in the coming fights.

It probably comes down to who you're more of a fan of too. I'm not saying it's always the case, but Pac fans will be more likely to see the fight going more Manny's way, and JMM's fans will see it going his way.

[Mattyhitman]

your too late mate, i think that has sailed

Oh, and your wrong anyway

I don't think any side is wrong here. Like what a poster said, BOXING SCORING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE. In a very close fight, people will be split on who to give the round to. They may try to distribute those rounds evenly on the two protagonist or they might give all of them to the boxer with the fighting style they prefer hence the huge discrepancy in some of the scorecards.

Until they come up with a better and more accurate way of scoring fights, then there will just be more of these arguments in the coming fights.

It probably comes down to who you're more of a fan of too. I'm not saying it's always the case, but Pac fans will be more likely to see the fight going more Manny's way, and JMM's fans will see it going his way.

I appreciate what ya saying about being a fan of one than another. The irony is Im more a Pac fan than JMM, I wanted, and predicted Pac to dominate the fight. I was left utterly dispondant by his performance. I was actually looking at Pac throughout the fight wanting him to do more, but in my eye's he didnt.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

your too late mate, i think that has sailed

Oh, and your wrong anyway

I don't think any side is wrong here. Like what a poster said, BOXING SCORING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE. In a very close fight, people will be split on who to give the round to. They may try to distribute those rounds evenly on the two protagonist or they might give all of them to the boxer with the fighting style they prefer hence the huge discrepancy in some of the scorecards.

Until they come up with a better and more accurate way of scoring fights, then there will just be more of these arguments in the coming fights.

It probably comes down to who you're more of a fan of too. I'm not saying it's always the case, but Pac fans will be more likely to see the fight going more Manny's way, and JMM's fans will see it going his way.

I appreciate what ya saying about being a fan of one than another. The irony is Im more a Pac fan than JMM, I wanted, and predicted Pac to dominate the fight. I was left utterly dispondant by his performance. I was actually looking at Pac throughout the fight wanting him to do more, but in my eye's he didnt.

I believe all Pacquiao fans are disappointed with how the fight went.

He did not dominate the fight as expected but he wasn't dominated in the fight either as some suggested.

Lousy performance by the P4P boxer + excellent performance by a huge underdog = perception that the underdog won in an almost even fight. In such close fight, nonpartisan fans would likely side with the underdog for the effort that was showed and for being able to make the fight competitive. This is just a theory and I am not presenting it here as fact.

[Leighton]

your too late mate, i think that has sailed

Oh, and your wrong anyway

I don't think any side is wrong here. Like what a poster said, BOXING SCORING IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE. In a very close fight, people will be split on who to give the round to. They may try to distribute those rounds evenly on the two protagonist or they might give all of them to the boxer with the fighting style they prefer hence the huge discrepancy in some of the scorecards.

Until they come up with a better and more accurate way of scoring fights, then there will just be more of these arguments in the coming fights.

It may not be an exact science but you didnt need science to work out who won this fight. Manny looked slower in his fight against Mosley. Even worse in the Margarito fight. And he could not work Marquez out at all. I really wanted him to win this fight so he could have a super fight with Mayweather but after that performance you can see he doesnt have even the slightest chance.
I think he is starting to enjoy the fancy cars and fame to much.
I believe anyone watching this fight without a favourite could see marquez won. I am a manny fan but he definitely lost.

[0james0]

You just love an argument Eric, if everyone on here said the sky was blue you'd say it was green!

[porkypara]

It was a very close fight and could hve gone to either boxer IMO.

The people who thought that JMM won by a landslide weere watching a different fight than me.

[Master]

I have not watched the fight myself as I could not afford it and had to prioritise feeding the kids instead. I had JMM winning the first 2 fights for the record but would have supported Pac Man in this fight purely because I want him to fight and beat Floyd. That may not be likely from the sound of things on this forum as Floyd is bigger, better and smarter.

[erics44]

I have not watched the fight myself as I could not afford it and had to prioritise feeding the kids instead. I had JMM winning the first 2 fights for the record but would have supported Pac Man in this fight purely because I want him to fight and beat Floyd. That may not be likely from the sound of things on this forum as Floyd is bigger, better and smarter.

Its on youtube now