Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1857
    Cool Clicks

    Default What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    Firstly I would like to say what a great knockout that was last weekend, it proved that Froch was overlooking Groves the first time around and when he took him seriously he got the job done in style. The knockout itself wasnt lucky at all, he knew exactly what he was going to do and he executed it perfectly. I was so made up with that.

    The options that have been mentioned for Froch are Chavez Jnr, Degale or Kessler 3 from what I have read. To be honest with you I dont want to see any of those, but if I had to chose Id take Kessler 3. Chavez doesnt deserve a shot and Degale might be mandatory but I think he needs to fight somebody in the top 10 to actually prove himself. Kessler 3 would no doubt be a great fight so I would watch that again but I am more interested in other fights...

    I wouldnt mind seeing Froch go and fight Bika next and get that WBC belt, with three major belts he will have more of a bargaining tool than Ward IMO. Froch-Bika would be a good fight but it would be winable for Froch and he can get that other belt. A three belt unification showdown is massive, regardless if Bika isnt the biggest draw around. He is more deserving of a shot vs Froch than Chavez Jnr is, even if Chavez is a bigger name...

    If Froch can do that or even if he cant, the big rematch vs Ward needs to happen. These two are the proven biggest names in the weight class and Froch has improved a lot since the last time as clearly shown in his performances. It would be a very good fight and I would like to see it outside of Wards comfort zone.

    If Froch could somehow win that, which I am not saying he would, it would be very close either way. Why shouldnt Froch move up to challenge B-hop or Stevenson or Kovalev? By the time this could happen, I expect the 175 weight class to be unified. Whoever out of those three has all of the belts vs Froch would be one of the biggest fights ever IMO.

    There is no need for Froch to retire when he is still putting in performances like last weekend and if he wants to improve his legacy even further he should go down this route. Imagine if he won the belts at 175 as well?? His resume and achievements would surpass Calzaghe' even with two defeats.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    Froch wont be going anywhere near Bika ever!

    Bika has just beaten 3 undefeated young world rated fighters in the trot!

    No names are fighting Bika any time soon. Kessler is going to wait for Froch. Froch is fighting Chavez then Kessler.

    Froch will not fight Ward again either.

    I think DeGale will end up having to fight Bika and Bika wins.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    719
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Froch wont be going anywhere near Bika ever!

    Bika has just beaten 3 undefeated young world rated fighters in the trot!

    No names are fighting Bika any time soon. Kessler is going to wait for Froch. Froch is fighting Chavez then Kessler.

    Froch will not fight Ward again either.

    I think DeGale will end up having to fight Bika and Bika wins.
    Yea but Sjekloca and Periban are shit and he only drew with Dirrell. Froch Bika would be a fun fight but beating him doesnt do much for his legacy and cant see him making much cash fighting him.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1857
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    GGG wants Froch too apparently

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,187
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3097
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    If Froch wants to have a greater legacy than Joe then he needs to avenge his defeat Ward. I think Froch will not risk doing that whilst he is on a high and wants to cash out in 3/4 fights.

    To have a good legacy other than Ward would be beat Junior, Kessler (rubber match), GGG and possible unification AA/Degale/Groves (you never know Groves may get back by then).

    Froch could go up to light heavy and take on Hopkins/Pascal/Kovolev/Stevenson as a final fight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2465
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    If Froch wants to have a greater legacy than Joe then he needs to avenge his defeat Ward. I think Froch will not risk doing that whilst he is on a high and wants to cash out in 3/4 fights.

    To have a good legacy other than Ward would be beat Junior, Kessler (rubber match), GGG and possible unification AA/Degale/Groves (you never know Groves may get back by then).

    Froch could go up to light heavy and take on Hopkins/Pascal/Kovolev/Stevenson as a final fight.
    If he beats Ward he is out of the top draw.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,971
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Firstly I would like to say what a great knockout that was last weekend, it proved that Froch was overlooking Groves the first time around and when he took him seriously he got the job done in style. The knockout itself wasnt lucky at all, he knew exactly what he was going to do and he executed it perfectly. I was so made up with that.

    The options that have been mentioned for Froch are Chavez Jnr, Degale or Kessler 3 from what I have read. To be honest with you I dont want to see any of those, but if I had to chose Id take Kessler 3. Chavez doesnt deserve a shot and Degale might be mandatory but I think he needs to fight somebody in the top 10 to actually prove himself. Kessler 3 would no doubt be a great fight so I would watch that again but I am more interested in other fights...

    I wouldnt mind seeing Froch go and fight Bika next and get that WBC belt, with three major belts he will have more of a bargaining tool than Ward IMO. Froch-Bika would be a good fight but it would be winable for Froch and he can get that other belt. A three belt unification showdown is massive, regardless if Bika isnt the biggest draw around. He is more deserving of a shot vs Froch than Chavez Jnr is, even if Chavez is a bigger name...

    If Froch can do that or even if he cant, the big rematch vs Ward needs to happen. These two are the proven biggest names in the weight class and Froch has improved a lot since the last time as clearly shown in his performances. It would be a very good fight and I would like to see it outside of Wards comfort zone.

    If Froch could somehow win that, which I am not saying he would, it would be very close either way. Why shouldnt Froch move up to challenge B-hop or Stevenson or Kovalev? By the time this could happen, I expect the 175 weight class to be unified. Whoever out of those three has all of the belts vs Froch would be one of the biggest fights ever IMO.

    There is no need for Froch to retire when he is still putting in performances like last weekend and if he wants to improve his legacy even further he should go down this route. Imagine if he won the belts at 175 as well?? His resume and achievements would surpass Calzaghe' even with two defeats.
    Utter RUBBISH.... Froch should go with Chavez Jr., Ward and then DeGale if DeGale remains unbeaten and on his path.

    Do not give Froch the soft path... he's much, much better than that.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1390
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    I think he should go after Chavez and GGG and crown himself king of the all action Heroes.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1352
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    The most important thing for him to do is to beat Ward, because then he can say he reached the top of his division (something that, for all his success and fan-fare, he's never been able to do).

    That's the fight that makes sense. It's the big money fight for both guys and would mean so much for Froch's legacy if he could dethrone a legit p4p great fighter in Ward.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1352
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    Calzaghe dominated his division for a while, as did Hatton. It can be argued that Froch is fighting in a much stronger division now than both of those guys did, but the fact remains that he has never been the #1 guy at his weight, and I think that fact will hold him back when people evaluate his career in hindsight.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Froch needs to do to define his legacy...

    "The reason that Andre Ward is never chucked in the mix [for his next fight] is because the American TV broadcasters aren't really excited about him," Froch told Sky Sports News. "He's going through a big promotional dispute at the minute.
    "He's a very, very good fighter and he beat me fair and square, he outpointed me. But he's messy, he's up close, he's awkward. He really is a bit of a spoiler. He's not somebody I'd be excited about getting in the ring with.
    "Someone like Chavez Jr will come and fight, and give me the fight I want and what the crowd wants. The television broadcasters could get on board and it would be more lucrative."
    http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/sport/stor ..

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    719
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Calzaghe dominated his division for a while, as did Hatton. It can be argued that Froch is fighting in a much stronger division now than both of those guys did, but the fact remains that he has never been the #1 guy at his weight, and I think that fact will hold him back when people evaluate his career in hindsight.
    I don't see how u can argue the div is stronger. The div is weak. Ward is good but the rest are nowhere near Calzaghe, Hopkins, Jones Jr etc

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Victor ortiz: I got caught, it doesn't define me
    By ykdadamaja in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 02-23-2014, 11:42 AM
  2. How do you define Ring Generalship?
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 05:30 AM
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 08:41 AM
  4. Define a "Duck"
    By Thread Stealer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 12:07 AM
  5. Define Ring Generalship?!
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-12-2007, 04:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing