Only 7 of 44 Muslim nations are on the Temp Ban

[brocktonblockbust]

Hahaha. 109 detained out of 345,000 and little petunias want to jump around with their knickers in a right twist.

Miles if it were ONE PERSON OIT OF 7 BILLION you'd cry "fascism".

[walrus]

Yes, a sovereign country can choose whether or not to allow in illegal immigrants, but why would you want to persecute those who have passed all the tests, have settled in America and have families to feed? People with residency and visas, people have done the right things. Now, true a sovereign country can then tell them to go away too, but that is messed up and ill thought through. It sets a very bad example.

There are over a million foreign people here and to be fair there was little meddling in the Middle East, so I don't think the burden of responsbility really falls upon such countries who do let people in if they follow the procedures.

@Gandalf how many are South Korea taking we have taken millions how about u

[Gandalf]

Yes, a sovereign country can choose whether or not to allow in illegal immigrants, but why would you want to persecute those who have passed all the tests, have settled in America and have families to feed? People with residency and visas, people have done the right things. Now, true a sovereign country can then tell them to go away too, but that is messed up and ill thought through. It sets a very bad example.

There are over a million foreign people here and to be fair there was little meddling in the Middle East, so I don't think the burden of responsbility really falls upon such countries who do let people in if they follow the procedures.

@Gandalf how many are South Korea taking we have taken millions how about u

To be fair, I didn't see many bombs being dropped on Syria nor very much in the way of arming 'rebel' groups either, so I don't see how that has anything to do with South Korea.

[brocktonblockbust]

Of course you don't see. How convenient.

Walrus: how many people does SK take in?

Miles: oh but the central banks.......

You just can't make this shit up

[walrus]

Yes, a sovereign country can choose whether or not to allow in illegal immigrants, but why would you want to persecute those who have passed all the tests, have settled in America and have families to feed? People with residency and visas, people have done the right things. Now, true a sovereign country can then tell them to go away too, but that is messed up and ill thought through. It sets a very bad example.

There are over a million foreign people here and to be fair there was little meddling in the Middle East, so I don't think the burden of responsbility really falls upon such countries who do let people in if they follow the procedures.

@Gandalf how many are South Korea taking we have taken millions how about u

To be fair, I didn't see many bombs being dropped on Syria nor very much in the way of arming 'rebel' groups either, so I don't see how that has anything to do with South Korea.

Oh it doesn't @Gandalf we have been taking people all over the world. Countries we never engaged for a hundred years. Every corner of the globe including South Korea now u are being evasive

[Gandalf]

Yes, a sovereign country can choose whether or not to allow in illegal immigrants, but why would you want to persecute those who have passed all the tests, have settled in America and have families to feed? People with residency and visas, people have done the right things. Now, true a sovereign country can then tell them to go away too, but that is messed up and ill thought through. It sets a very bad example.

There are over a million foreign people here and to be fair there was little meddling in the Middle East, so I don't think the burden of responsbility really falls upon such countries who do let people in if they follow the procedures.

@Gandalf how many are South Korea taking we have taken millions how about u

To be fair, I didn't see many bombs being dropped on Syria nor very much in the way of arming 'rebel' groups either, so I don't see how that has anything to do with South Korea.

Oh it doesn't @Gandalf we have been taking people all over the world. Countries we never engaged for a hundred years. Every corner of the globe including South Korea now u are being evasive

Not being evasive in the slightest. I am not even in favor of open borders, but to restrict the access and rights of permanent residents is folly.

Countries that do not destroy other countries don't really have any obligation to open their borders. The guilt of Syria is all on the West.

My argument is a simple one. Stop bombing and selling arms to other countries and just maybe there will be less chaos in this world.

[walrus]

Yes, a sovereign country can choose whether or not to allow in illegal immigrants, but why would you want to persecute those who have passed all the tests, have settled in America and have families to feed? People with residency and visas, people have done the right things. Now, true a sovereign country can then tell them to go away too, but that is messed up and ill thought through. It sets a very bad example.

There are over a million foreign people here and to be fair there was little meddling in the Middle East, so I don't think the burden of responsbility really falls upon such countries who do let people in if they follow the procedures.

@Gandalf how many are South Korea taking we have taken millions how about u

To be fair, I didn't see many bombs being dropped on Syria nor very much in the way of arming 'rebel' groups either, so I don't see how that has anything to do with South Korea.

Oh it doesn't @Gandalf we have been taking people all over the world. Countries we never engaged for a hundred years. Every corner of the globe including South Korea now u are being evasive

Not being evasive in the slightest. I am not even in favor of open borders, but to restrict the access and rights of permanent residents is folly.

Countries that do not destroy other countries don't really have any obligation to open their borders. The guilt of Syria is all on the West.

My argument is a simple one. Stop bombing and selling arms to other countries and just maybe there will be less chaos in this world.

Ok we have taken in more people in the past hundred years than anyone in history. How about u guys

[Gandalf]

Your country is based upon displacing a native population. You are all immigrants if you want to take the long view.

[walrus]

Your country is based upon displacing a native population. You are all immigrants if you want to take the long view.

3 so compassionate

[walrus]

Miles FYI my state alone took 1800 Syrians this year and it's only a month old and we are one of the smallest states you have taken 3 that's three since 1994

[brocktonblockbust]

Pragmatic will just never be an adjective to describe these people.

[Dark Lord Al]

Sheeple

Yes Sheeple like the flock of unwashed / yogurt knitters / z-list celebs / and immigrants protesting about Trumps visit to the UK outside downing street. - SHEEPLE.

[Gandalf]

Miles FYI my state alone took 1800 Syrians this year and it's only a month old and we are one of the smallest states you have taken 3 that's three since 1994

I sound like a broken record, but if you wouldn't destroy a country, then there would be no need to take in refugees. Countries that remain neutral and do not cause conflict are under no obligation to get involved. I think immigration should be sensible as you will end up with no go areas and crime and a country not involved in conflicts would be foolish to invite that. It's nuts.

[greynotsoold]

Sheeple

Yes Sheeple like the flock of unwashed / yogurt knitters / z-list celebs / and immigrants protesting about Trumps visit to the UK outside downing street. - SHEEPLE.

Curious that they didn't protest two weeks ago when Obama, on his way out, ended the 60 year "wet foot/dry foot" policy and screwed of literal boatloads of Cuban refugees.

[El Kabong]

The guilt of Syria is all on the West.

Ummmm how so? Bashir Assad ain't our guy...he's Russia's guy.