facts mate facts.. Joe fought Eubank if im not mistaken last quarter of 97 (he is on the decline and not a prime version).. that makes Joe past 25 year old... And as of Frank Warren, well i may be wrong but come on he said it himself i didn't invent it. He says he match his fighters carefully... you draw the line there... What does that mean... and to answer that look at his fighters record.. Records don't lie... peace bro..
For Pavlik, man he beat the man who beat the man of the division... Taylor beat Hopkins twice.. and mind you he beat a 3 years younger version of Hopkins (than the time Joe beat Hopkins).. Now tell me who the FUCK TAYLOR IS? Comparing Taylor against Eubank is plain ridiculous to begin with.. Better compare them by the time Joe fought Eubank then Pavlik against Taylor..
As for the Locket issue.. Pavlik did what he is supposed to do... Knock the bum out.. Again im not discrediting Joes achievements but comparing it to the fighter he loves to discredit as a possible opponent... If Pavlik can't past Hopkins then i might change my mind regarding him but until then i wait and see..
Yes of course he has Joe , well spending 98% of your career fighting second rate oponants does make you chin solid either.
like I always thought this fight will happen! As long as both fighters win there fights(which either could lose) this will definetly happen, all Joes doing now is hyping it up, by saying he's not gonna fight him will just generate more money for himself when he does agree to it
Benn wasn't supposed to beat McClellan thats a fact. Warren though is no different to anyother promoter regarding matching his fighters.
Taylor got old man Hopkins similar if you like to Joe beating Eubank - though Joe did do a better job. Hopkins and Eubank were still difficult opponents - just cause a fighter has seen better days doesn't mean hes a soft touch.
Pavlik is a fighter who I personally hope rules for years and I understand him wanting to get out of a weak division but he should clean up the division with a fight against Abraham. ( I think Pavlik will win but its no formality). Pavlik as you say is the man and he beat Taylor who struggled with Cory Spinks and Kassim Ouma for fuck sake - little guys in the wrong division.
I also see the Pavlik vs Calzaghe fight happening unless Joes hands go again against Roy. But then will Kelly deserve credit for beating an old Calzaghe who no longer has snap in his punches?
Had Taylor hit any other boxer with those type of punches, they would've done the same thing. None of those shots Pavlik took were glancing, they were all FLUSH shots to the dome and it's impressive he got up and survived that round...
In the business aspect of the sport, which would be a smarter move, calling out Abraham who only boxing fans know, or calling out Calzaghe and fighting Hopkins? IMO Pavlik is making the right choice. Abraham is someone he should fight eventually but Pavlik has bigger fish to fry right now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks