Boxrec RULES!!!!

[killersheep]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

[kingfrnk]

holy crap! they really do and actually have him above Hatton. how is this possible??

[RP33]

i don't even talk about it anymore, because boxrec's rankings are ALWAYS wayyy off.. they work on some sort of point system i believe, but it's horrible..

[Youngblood]

crystal ball ftw.

[killersheep]

i don't even talk about it anymore, because boxrec's rankings are ALWAYS wayyy off.. they work on some sort of point system i believe, but it's horrible..

That's what I usually do too, but this was so off I actually lol'ed.
I don't understand how even a computer run point system could figure that.

[littlebif]

Thats is a insult to Hatton, Pac has never fought at 140 yet!

[antimoron]

Thats is a insult to Hatton, Pac has never fought at 140 yet!

not only to Hatton mate but the whole 140 division...

the hell with their ratings.. they should stick to recording wins and losses..

[Kel]

LOL demented

[GAME]

Boxrtec rankings have always been known for being a joke to put it nicely

[DaxxKahn]

Great for 2 thngs..

1 a fighters record and upcoming scheduale

2. a good laugh now and again

[XaduBoxer]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

[killersheep]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

[XaduBoxer]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

[killersheep]

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............

[XaduBoxer]

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............

That's all... Why not say something why it fails? Just like how I illustrate why Klitscho can't be #1 in all weight divisions...
.