A 3 inch advantage enjoyed in Paulie's caliber means nothing but if you have it in PAC's caliber and skills, it means disaster to the opponent...
BTW, sorry again for that honest mistake but anyway it doesn't change the fact that PAC enjoys a considerable reach advantage over Hatton...
.
Or maybe Pac's arms are actually shrinking!! You guys could be in trouble come fight night!![]()
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!
Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO![]()
I tell you what it means........it means nothing. The whole idea of a punchers chance is that a person has a very slim chance of winning because of a stray punch actually connecting.
People want to surround themselves with vagueness....and it is simply not the proper way to communicate to anyone.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks