Roach: Mayweather-Pacquiao tricky to set up

[Pavlik]

50/50 if fair IMO assuming Floyd beats JMM even by kayo, considering PAC's wins over Oscar and Hatton were far more impressive than PBF's wins over them.

[Majesty]

50/50 if fair IMO assuming Floyd beats JMM even by kayo, considering PAC's wins over Oscar and Hatton were far more impressive than PBF's wins over them.

Maybe because Pacquiao is a one punch knockout artist thats very aggressive while Mayweather is a counter puncher with underrated power? Of course Pacquiao's wins are gonna look more spectacular because he fights a better crowd pleasing style

[Addicted to_boxing]

What about if JMM wins by Decision - % ?
KO - % ?

I feel JMM will have finally upped Pac and deserves the larger Purse based on his last 3 opponents vs Pac's....

[piye]

In reality, who get's the larger purse is determined by who has the more buys for their big fights! out of mayweather and Pacman in the last two fights against the same two opponents who has had the bigger amount of buys?

[mnmc10]

Roach has started the excuse making for Pacquiao pretty damn early. It should be 60-40 Mayweather. A win over the current p4p number 1 Marquez mean more than Pacquiao's recent wins combined

where do you get ur infos?

pacqviao is #1 p4p FACT
jmm #1 p4p <=== your personal opinion

pbf's way of avoiding a worthy opponent is to get the majority of the purse. ofcourse the better fighter wont agree so the fight wont happen. soon people will react to that and pbf will be forced to get what he is only worth not the majority of the money.

[amat]

In reality, who get's the larger purse is determined by who has the more buys for their big fights! out of mayweather and Pacman in the last two fights against the same two opponents who has had the bigger amount of buys?

Arum won't disclose the PPV buys probably (my guess) for that reason but Dan Rafeal said that Pac-Hatton did 850,000 buys while Mayweather's did 975,000. And obviously Mayweather's fight with De La Hoya's did more then Pacquiao's. So that would be Mayweather but in both fights Pacquiao's performances have been more exciting.

Whatever though, the whole topic is garbage because neither guy should want more because they both need each other more then anything.

[C-Lo]

60-40 to the WINNER!

Problem solved, no?

We wish!

People don't go for more money to the winner in bigger fights because, I honestly don't know why! I really feel like there's more at stake if the winner gets a bigger cut of the fight's revenue.