Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1530
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

    and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is
    He had to fight Veit or he would have been stripped of his wbo belt.
    Balls

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1036
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Calzaghe is a great boxer period.. But no way on earth would he beat prime roy at super middle..no one would. Not even wife beater ray robinson. Frank warren done well in keeping joe undefeated..just like rocky m they were both undefeated. But not the greatest.

  3. #33
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    I think Joe Cal would have beaten Bute and Ward. Joe did a number on Kessler in his prime. Joe had underrated power and a ton of stamina. Joe even beat B Hop when B Hop was fighting like a little bitch and trying to cheat his way to a victory.
    PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
    The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  6. #36
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Im at a loss how you thought Carl Froch beat Mikkel Kessler but thats just my opinion. I said i didn't want to debate it again, because its been debated to death trust me. I just liked B-Hop's cleaner punches.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Im at a loss how you thought Carl Froch beat Mikkel Kessler but thats just my opinion. I said i didn't want to debate it again, because its been debated to death trust me. I just liked B-Hop's cleaner punches.
    i did think froch won that fight, i can understand a case for the other way but i thought froch won a close fight, even those that thought kessler won thought it was close and some rounds could be seen either way

    i wont mention hopkins calazaghi gain then if you dont want to talk about it
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Age of peak
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 03:10 AM
  2. Peak?
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-26-2010, 06:04 PM
  3. Did Margarito peak?
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-31-2008, 01:11 PM
  4. The Peak-a-Boo Style Question
    By clean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 12:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing