Come the fuck on. Chavez name ain't got shit to do with it. That shit is done all the time in the South and Mid-West. They do it in other countries as well.He's technically an amateur (since he has no amateur experience what so ever) facing guys who have 2 or 3 times his experience. I wonder if people would think different about him if he didn't have Chavez as his last name.Then this fight would be fair since both guys are no good, don't you think?Another goldfish being fed to the......
Gee... I'm at a loss here. Can't very well compare Chavez Jr. to a shark. That would be insulting to "shark-kind".
Ok. Another goldfish being fed to the big grouper.
C'mon........ Lee? No offense to Lee fans, but... what credentials does Lee have that would make him a dangerous opponent to Baby Chavez? He's slow... he's clumsy... and not that hard to hit. What does he bring to the table for Chavez? He doesn't strike me as a particularly hard puncher. So he's slow, and not a big puncher. Seems tailor-made for Chavez Jr. Daddy must be pleased.
I'm not saying Chavez is no good... I'm just saying he's not as good as his bloated record would indicate. Give me a 25-1 or 30-2 fighter who's faced the best competition out there... instead of a coddled 45-0-1 fighter, who's being spoon-fed carefully picked opponents..... any day of the week.
If he's technically an amateur, he shouldn't have a 45-0-1 record. It's misleading. It's insulting to those boxers who had an extensive amateur career and then turned pro. You don't see anybody adding their amateur victories to their pro record do you? It's like comparing apples and oranges. And really..... if he didn't have the Chavez last name, he would've never been allowed to amass such a pro record without fighting anyone with a pulse.
Bookmarks