I don't know what the fuck you're talking about, when I disagree with someone in a debate they are usually making educated points that I can understand but just don't concur, such as if someone told me that they thought James Tony was better than Bernard Hopkins, that is something I would disagree with but you can make points that would make that argument legit / Now if someone told me that John Ruiz was better than Wlad or Vatali that would be an argument so incredibly stupid I would not even respond.
So if my argument is so ridiculous and does not make since why the fuck do you respond.
Bookmarks