Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: A points ranking system to legitimise boxing rankings and championships!!

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Crawley, West Sussex
    Posts
    4,254
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A points ranking system to legitimise boxing rankings and championships!!

    Quote Originally Posted by yaltamaltadavid View Post
    Weight needs to be black and white for fights to determine rankings. I'm sure you accept that a boxer can't miss weight and win a title, so fights over the weight should only affect ranking in the divsion above. It's especially not fair to other boxers who do consistently fight at the lower division.That principle is one standardised rankings need to stick to.
    You always need grey areas in boxing. There is no point penalizing two middleweight contenders for fighting each other at a contracted weight a little above 160lbs.

    This is still boxing, if a guy chooses to not fight the number 1 contender in favour of a more marquee fighter he has every right to. But if clear, objective rankings are accepted fans and media can see that such a boxer can't pull the wool over the public's eyes and claim he fights the best. Alphabet belts allow boxers to get away with fighting mismatched opponents. And if any rankings body has the power to determine fights it will always be open to influence from promoters. If fair objective rankings became accepted and entrenched they'll in fact have much more success at pushing boxers to take on better competition.
    So what you are saying is there is grey areas in boxing then?

    There haven't been a 'number' of points ranking systems. I don't think you can name another besides boxrec and the IBO.
    Not trying to be pedantic, but...

    The IBO is a sanctioning body and a business, and that it sells championships to garbage fighters so it can make money is proof enough that their rankings are worthless. Credible rankings must be independent. The boxrec rankings are not reflective of strict performace because they use so many irrelevant factors in their bizarre algorithym. Even if it did produce rankings reflective of simple accomplishments their system has little appeal because it's not clear and predictable, while what I've proposed is simple and transparent.
    But what you have created is a rating of those bastardized organizations. And because your system is so simple and transparent, it will in a sport like boxing be open to abuse. Personally I do not think boxing ratings using mathematical formulas (no matter how simple) work, but if you are serious you need to find a way to measure intangibles.

    Boxing to me though, is as much an art as it science, and thus there are certain measurements that are just opinion and totally open, and so cannot be scientifically measured.
    Last edited by Britkid; 08-30-2013 at 09:00 PM.
    "Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."

    George Foreman

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-14-2007, 08:48 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-27-2007, 04:17 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2006, 03:30 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2006, 01:36 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 05:01 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing