Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
i am a 100% hater, i have very good reason , your only argument in all this is that i am a hater tho

let me ask you a couple of questions

was the outcome of the burns / beltram fight acceptable? do you believe that that was a hometown decision?

were the outcomes a lot of the sven ottke fights acceptable? do you believe that there was any corrutpness involved in those decisions?

that burns fight and more recently the froch/groves fights suggest to me that some of the eddie hearn fighters are given some privaledges in fights, why would eddie not do all he can to ensure his cash cows remain champions

wlad generates more money in any one of his fights than ottke did in all of his title fights put together, probably more than the ricky burns fights plus the froch groves fight

why would the people behind his fights not do all they can to keep him as champ?

consider this and look at the fact that he extremely excessively holds in all his fights (more than he punches for the majority of the fight) and is only ever suprficially warned for it

nice cash cow that isnt it, all they have to do is let him hold

to me mate it is absolutely plainly obvious it is happening
never saw Burns-Beltran so I won't comment on it.

Ottke had some very questionable "wins" but those are by decision and judges have been known to make poor decisions. Also there was the Reid fight where Reid was warned for punching Ottke....have you seen that happen in a Klitschko fight? I haven't and I unlike YOU watch those fights.

What's obvious to me is Wlad wins decisively by UD or KO.....what fight should he have lost?