Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
That is a good question. I think when you look at how systems of power operate there is often a duality. For instance, they claim to be fighting terrorism yet are actively funding and supporting terrorist groups. They twist language so that even dissent becomes terrorism, yet government creates terrorism! I think in a similar way, feminism came about in the guise of women's liberation, which of course, to some extent it was, but it also got women into work so that corporations could further reduce wages and children became wards of the state. With sexuality you see the guise of equal rights, but where is the push coming from exactly? Even back in the 1970's Labour politicians were promoting lowering the age of consent, basically legalising paedophilia. My own view, and people will disagree, is that it is all about subverting moral norms and conditioning people to accept and tolerate things such as the lowering of the age of consent later on. There are deviant people in positions of power that want their behaviour to be seen as less deviant now that it is becoming common knowledge what they have been up to. Once you accept gay marriage and gays adopting etc, then you know you are at the stage where almost anything is permitted. Then these people have no reason to fear the law or act in fear. It is good that people want to share their lives together, but I think the rush to get this all passed, is intentional and has ulterior motives. Society functioned better when government was more for people and family instead of corporations and broken families. That much is fairly obvious. We should be very careful as we know what works but do the opposite with the financial systems, morality, wars, destruction of the family etc.



"Once you accept gay marriage and gays adopting etc, then you know you are at the stage where almost anything is permitted"

What a daft thing to say. You are making links that are just not there and jumping to conclusions in order to bolster what is an incredibly feeble argument. You link deviancy and homosexuality when in reality A gay person living in denial would be the deviant one. You do realise that child abusers are very often married straight man who trumpet the same family values bullshit that you try and ram down our throats every day ? The idea that feminism sneaked in under the guise of women's liberation and this allowed corporations to reduce wages and governments to make children wards of state is another load of bollocks. What are you suggesting ? That women should not have been afforded the right to work ? That men are superior to women? That Gay people have an agenda, where they want everyone else to be gay,and can somehow with propaganda make this happen ? What planet are you on mate?