I am not a Floyd fan but considering his strategies and the climb from division to division and the fact that he did his homework and the champions he fought at this particular time his resume is good. The only thing that ruins a fighter's resume and style is that he is not what everyone expects him to be. I do not feel as though he is an all time great. He has done great things and that is the difference. He is always in reasonable shape when he is not in training and his personality at least 89% of the time sucks rotten eggs which has nothing to do with his abilities and so far unless his spending habits outside the ring fucks him and his accomplishments are forgotten his resume has good names. Has he ever had to fight hard? Ask Castillo, ask Cotto and for a few good round ask Maidana just as a couple of examples no one has easy nights all the time but face it you only have so many good opponents. The reason I shy away from ATG is the definition has left the term long ago because when someone is great, he has no comparison. Competition is what this is about and new methods to an old sport brought by the next so called ATG. I am not going to beat around the bush. I was in a classroom with a motivator once and he said, "When you think you have arrived look over your shoulder." I purposely left out a few words at the end because you guys are intelligent and you analyze it all the time Loyd's resume has to be looked at closer to appreciate it and he is good but I am not a fan but his fights interest me and his style is definitely one to be studied or he can cure your insomnia.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote
Bookmarks