Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Not going against GGG here, as I've been a fan of his myself. But do we really have to bring down the record of someone like Hagler to make a point? "Dominance of mediocrity"? Not really interested in a game of "X's opponents were better than Y's opponents".... but IMHO Hagler fought a very acceptable group of opponents at his peak.
Apparently. I'm simply pointing out the different measuring stick being used and its unfair. And if the Kazak were American, we would not even be having this conversation. And please dont take things out of context. It should be more then clear by now what I am attempting and the fact of the matter is, Haglers actual middleweight competition was no less or more mediocre the Golovkins. Thats simply a fact. They dont take sides.