Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.
No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.
I Still haven't had a reply, apart from "Shut up Primo", so I thought I would re-post it again!
Tell me another win over a fighter who has held a world title for so long? Yes he hasnt dominated the whole division for that entire period but how many other wins have been over a fighter who has defended a title as long? Hatton over Tszyu which is a fight along with Clay v Liston that I used for those finding it hard to imagine Fury beating Wlad. The. randal over Chavez and after that out of the thousands of world title fights in the last 25 years there arent many if any and certainly not at heavyweight!
More contradictions!