Last win by any fighter better than this for Fury.

[ross]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

[Primo Carnera]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

[Primo Carnera]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

Hmmm, very strange, no reply to this. Because you don't fucking have one! so Ross does what what Ross does best, go and hijack another thread and spurt out the same old Bollox. I would venture to say that there are loads of victories against guys who were "undisputed and dominant" for 2 years. makes it all very different, doesn't it?
You've been hung by your own rope, so I suggest that in order for you to continue talking shite on other threads, the mods should free some space by getting rid of this Pointless, Factually incorrect Thread.

[ross]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

Hmmm, very strange, no reply to this. Because you don't fucking have one! so Ross does what what Ross does best, go and hijack another thread and spurt out the same old Bollox. I would venture to say that there are loads of victories against guys who were "undisputed and dominant" for 2 years. makes it all very different, doesn't it?
You've been hung by your own rope, so I suggest that in order for you to continue talking shite on other threads, the mods should free some space by getting rid of this Pointless, Factually incorrect Thread.

Shut up Primo! If you want to go by length of unification then Wlad is higher in the rankings than Holmes because Holmes only held one belt for his entire reign!

[Primo Carnera]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

Hmmm, very strange, no reply to this. Because you don't fucking have one! so Ross does what what Ross does best, go and hijack another thread and spurt out the same old Bollox. I would venture to say that there are loads of victories against guys who were "undisputed and dominant" for 2 years. makes it all very different, doesn't it?
You've been hung by your own rope, so I suggest that in order for you to continue talking shite on other threads, the mods should free some space by getting rid of this Pointless, Factually incorrect Thread.

Shut up Primo! If you want to go by length of unification then Wlad is higher in the rankings than Holmes because Holmes only held one belt for his entire reign!

Hahahahaha! nice reply "Shut up Primo!" it's not what I want to go by , it's what YOU want to go by , after all , you started the pointless thread. the only thing is , you keep changing the parameters!
I mean, look at the heading , according to that, you imply that there has never been a better win for any fighter EVER! you ridiculous fool!
I said to you before the fight, that not many would be irritated by Fury winning, most would be quite pleased , and that's exactly how it's panned out. what most people would be irritated by is YOUR Nauseating droning and this is a perfect example. Have a nice day!

[Fenster]

Wlad has been "champion" for 10 years in an absolute dog shit division that is only now getting back to what it was. He hasn't beat anyone heading for the HOF.

Fury pulled off a good upset. That's it. (thankfully)

[ross]

Wlad has been "champion" for 10 years in an absolute dog shit division that is only now getting back to what it was. He hasn't beat anyone heading for the HOF.

Fury pulled off a good upset. That's it. (thankfully)

So what is Holmes reign worth? Never unified. Only had to face one organisations challengers.

[Primo Carnera]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

I Still haven't had a reply, apart from "Shut up Primo", so I thought I would re-post it again!

[ross]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

I Still haven't had a reply, apart from "Shut up Primo", so I thought I would re-post it again!

Tell me another win over a fighter who has held a world title for so long? Yes he hasnt dominated the whole division for that entire period but how many other wins have been over a fighter who has defended a title as long? Hatton over Tszyu which is a fight along with Clay v Liston that I used for those finding it hard to imagine Fury beating Wlad. The. randal over Chavez and after that out of the thousands of world title fights in the last 25 years there arent many if any and certainly not at heavyweight!

[Primo Carnera]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.

No, it's very specific so that there can only be one answer. I'm not pissing on Fury's bonfire, fair play to him. I'm just pissing all over your argument. After all, in amongst all the horse shit you've posted recently, I clearly remember When somebody said Wlad had dominated the Division for 10 years, YOU said he's only done so for 2 years, because his brother had before that!!! So that kind of renders your thread as pretty meaningless and FACTUALLY INCORRECT, does it not? Now if you want to reply, crack on, but I'm bored of this , so I'll read it in the morning.

I Still haven't had a reply, apart from "Shut up Primo", so I thought I would re-post it again!

Tell me another win over a fighter who has held a world title for so long? Yes he hasnt dominated the whole division for that entire period but how many other wins have been over a fighter who has defended a title as long? Hatton over Tszyu which is a fight along with Clay v Liston that I used for those finding it hard to imagine Fury beating Wlad. The. randal over Chavez and after that out of the thousands of world title fights in the last 25 years there arent many if any and certainly not at heavyweight!

More contradictions!