Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
I supplied facts and you supplied opinion not addressing those facts. So let me explain it again

Hatton turned down contracts and made no counter offers. You started this saying it wasn't Hatton that was delaying it. I supplied a piece where Hatton says out of his own mouth that they weren't looking to fight Floyd. Facts. I alreafy proved you wrong.

As for Margarito you skip over the main factors. If Floydwa nted out of his contractt he couldn't wait, there was a timetable to the buyout option. And if Floyd did sign to fight Margarito the contract included an extension that would only get him 7 million for Cotto or 7 million for Hatton and no DLH fight. That's about 100 million in losses. It was a shit f'n contract. Try and debate that fact. Try!
Thank you Ron for working so hard to prove my point for me in your very own argument



You mean somebody can turn down a contract because the contract is bad?!?!?!?! I mean WOW, what a surprise.....but Hatton didn't do that he turned down the contract because why again?



Hey did Floyd counter offer contracts for that extension?



HAHAHA
I'm really sorry to get in the middle of your's and Ron's little discussion, but I don't really understand what the argument is here. I'm guessing that you're saying that Hatton and Mayweather didn't fight when it would've suited Hatton best AND at the weight that suited Hatton best? Because Financially I don't think it is at all possible that Hatton could've got a better deal.
He was fighting the no.1 p4p in Vegas and Hatton got ALL THE PPV in the UK. Floyd made a little error because he couldn't have possibly understood just how much support Hatton could generate.
So if it's down to timing and weight , I have to say that Mayweather would've beaten ANY HATTON AT ANY TIME AND AT ANY WEIGHT.
Surely that's all that counts isn't it?