Re: Is Brook a "quitter?"

Originally Posted by
erics44

Originally Posted by
Gandalf
He did quit, but it is very understandable. What I cannot understand is a) why Brook fought Golovkin 2 weights more than his regular weight and b) why he then fought such a dangerous fighter immediately after having his eye bashed in like that? I think these have been 2 very poor decisions that have likely shortened his career. I just scratch my head trying to make sense of it.
I cant understand it either
do you think it would have happened if brook was with a different promoter? warren maybe?
Spence and the sanctioning body would not have allowed Brook to make a voluntary defence. There was no other easy option and another promoter would not have made any difference.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Bookmarks