It's such an intellectually dishonest way to 'debate'. To turn criticism of immigration into an automatic advocacy of 'racism' and to then resort to very crude 'Ad Hominem' and then run away. Surely you have to accept that a huge net loss to an economy over 15 years is pretty substantial. One cannot just ignore it and pretend that it does not matter. 6 billions pounds a year. An article a few days ago suggested the NHS needed an immediate 3 billion. That would be easy to find if between 119 - 150 billion (or even more) had not been frittered away bringing in people who would cost money. And for sure, far more was given to the banks too.
Angry poster not called Beanz goes on to suggest that allegiances do not lie with a country which apparently has been run away from, but Brexit tells its own story as do polls asking what Europeans feel about immigration within their societies. One can make it a personal attack but what about what those in Europe or the UK, you know people who actually live there, and the data from those people? I have never participated in such a poll. When 47% of the populace argue that Islam has no place in a Western society, that is the British people. When 66% of Germans say the same, that is their voice. When a majority votes for Brexit that is their voice. When 89% of the population wants no more population growth it might be wise to listen to them.
Is everyone now a racist and a traitor? It is a very ideological way to look at things. I thought this was a debate about wealth inequality, but somebody does not know how to debate.![]()


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks