Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut
Either 1 & 2 or 1 & 3- they allow 1 & 3 to fight for vacant titles if there is very little disparity between 2 & 3.
Right. So even though the ring doesn't recognise the WBO it still had Calzaghe ranked in a position to take their title?
Logic??!!?!?!? You can't argue on the basis of logic, it has to be all down to some old American pundits and writers and their opinions. Calzaghe's first title shot in their view was for the ring belt. Totally mkes sense.