
Originally Posted by
Jimboogie

Originally Posted by
Bilbo

Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
I'm a big Jack Johnson fan and reckon he could win this. He did struggle to get motivated for fights though.
A motivated Johnson would have been trouble for any fighter in history imo.
Even Larry Holmes said that he felt the only fighter in history who he would have struggled to beat was Jack Johnson.
Well Holmes must of been being nice to Johnson because no way Holmes would of struggled with Johnson he has very old boxing style that wouldn't work in newer eras Tunney by decision.
Have you ever even watched Johnson fight? Most fighters couldn't even lay a glove on him.
He was at least 50 years ahead of his time. If he would have lived and fought in another era he would have mastered the current level of boxing knowledge and built upon it again.
Do you think if Gallileo or Newton lived today they would be crap scientists and have less understanding of physics than the average high school student?
Of course not, they would absorb all of today's knowledge and build upon it. They would have been brilliant visonaries in any era, and so would have Jack Johnson.
Nice point but im not sure if Intelligence and Athleticism go hand in hand?
Athleticism wasn't what made Johnson great, it was a masterful understanding of the sweet science of the defensive arts. No matter what era he would have fought in his intuitive understanding of boxing would have made him a nightmare for anybody to face.
How anyone could possibly think his style wouldn't be any good today is completely beyond me to honest
Can anyone seriously imagine Sam Peter, Oleg Maskaev, Shannon Briggs and the like having a F****** cool about how to unlock his defense? He'd make most of today's heavies look silly.
I'd fancy his chances against any fighter who ever lived.
Bookmarks