Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
Wow, what a great response.
This is the intelligent debate which makes Saddo's great folks.



Fifty years time your grandson is looking at Hattons record.

Objectively, he can see two scenarios.
1 A win oveer another LWW title holder with defnses on record and a distance loss to Cotto

or
2. A win over a guy rising from Superfeatherweight where he won a MD and then fought Diaz for the LW title.



Give it a rest. You're in a minority of one.
Put in some effort, you've given no point as to why Pac vs. Hatton is a better fight apart from it being more exciting.
Manny Pacquiao is the P4P number 1 fighter and is known by even armchair fans all around the world. Pacquiao is considered to be one of the best fighters of this generation where as Paulie is only known for taking a good beating off Cotto, other than that he has looked like a joke in his other fights after the Cotto one. Hatton would get more credit for beating Pacquiao and he would for certain be a top 10 P4P fighter for beating Pacquiao, and would be praised by boxing fans from all around the world for that feat. He would earn more money and it would be Hatton's kind of a fight a good old tear up, instead of having to chase after Paulie all around the ring, in years to come i truly believe Hatton would get much better praise for beating one of the best fighters of this generation aka Pacquiao, than Paulie who people describe as an 80s reject boy band, and like i said is only known for winning 3 rounds against Cotto and taking a good beating. Where as Pacquiao is considered by boxing fans everywhere to be a great.