
Originally Posted by
mrbig1

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Yeah but as has already been noted both Wilard and Braddock meant much more to boxing history than Quarry did.
Also both Willard and Braddock were undisputed heavyweight champs, Quarrey never was.
Man come on. I think we both know Quarry would have been champion in their era. We must look at the era at which they fought. Quarry era was much,much tougher that Braddock or Wilard.
No, we don't. Braddock was never KO'd and stopped only once on cuts and they were fighting without chambered gloves at the time. He fought half his career with a broken hand. Quarry was KO'd 6 times. There is no way you can say Quarry was TOUGHER than Braddock.
Bookmarks