Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
I think also the points awarding system could be restructed a little to define rankings e.g.

23 points for #1
19 points for #2
16 points for #3
14 points for #4
11 points for #5
9 points for #6
7 points for #7
5 points for #8
3 points for #9
1 point for #10

What do you guys think?
I did PM everyone earlier, the different point weights don't matter take for example fighter A and B
I rate A at 6th for 9 points and B at 5th for 11 points, you rank them the opposite A at 5th for 11 points and B for 9 points
the both have a value of 20 points as a tie, this is what's happening right now at a larger scale. The points system as it stands works we simply need more votes. Furthermore we need to decide if we turn ties over to the Division Manager to make the call or to revote on tie breakers.

As Galaxy mentioned this only will happen once for this initial vote then the system of fighting for rank and stripping for inactivity comes into play it will be almost automated after that. The only job for the managers is to notify the committee when something has come up in there division to vote on. Votes will occur to take fill in vacant spots in the rankings and to determine if the fight is worthy of a Title.