
Originally Posted by
Galaxy

Originally Posted by
Spicoli
I'm all for seeing vacancies filled in a timely manner but dont like the idea of voting in that many fighters.The 10th spot is one thing but 3 is too many I believe.Clearly the division is in flux and I think we should think it through before we just start stuffing guys in as opposed to waiting for actual matches to determine ranks....I would leave at least one spot open.
I personally have no problem with voting for positions, most of the active managers are pretty fair & can put forward a good case for a nominee.
I think Williams' win over Wright was worthy of rating, I also think the winner of the upcoming Macklin/ Barker fight could qualify for another spot. Then someone like Geale could be possible for 10th...
I'm not trying to swim up a waterfall here and I'm not opposed to nominating a fight prior to it taking place as a vacancy filler.And of course I have no doubt in the managers ability and fairness.
I have just been rethinking the rush to fill all three spots and see no harm in actually having at least one stay open.Let things play out and not construct a ranking spot.Who knows what matchup is in the works,pool members or otherwise that will warrant definite ranking.
BTW My vote is no and am not sure why this poll is closed.Numbers maybe one thing but it is still being discussed and managers putting forth opinion !! Not cool
Bookmarks