Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: If Hatton had not blown up in weight between fights...

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1147
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Hatton had not blown up in weight betweenn fights...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blegit View Post
    This is a very good topic that needs addressed. I think people who think it didn't matter are only looking at his success. No one is perfect but anybody who is human can always be better at something they do. The goal is to minimize that gap. Hatton was/is a good boxer who was great for how he treated his body. Actually, Hatton did exceptionally well considering the lengthy period of time he would blow up to the 170s in between fights. No trainer would want to or allow their fighter do this for more than once or twice a career. 30 something pounds for a small guy to drop is asking for danger. BHop is a very good example of what usually happens when a fighter absolutely takes care of himself in between fights. Hopkins doesn't drink, party, let his weight get up there, or break from the gym for more than a week. Hatton probably would've lost to both Pac and PBF because of technical flaws but he would've gave both, especially PBF, more trouble and been more durable. Even though it seems obvious it should be said. Hatton would've been a significantly better equipped fighter had he took better care of his body.
    And yet everyone agree's he would have still lost to Floyd and Pac. So living as a fat pisshead outside the ring didn't harm his career in the slightest.

    What about the mental side? Some people may benefit from being able to totally seperate themselves from the sport and then give it 100% focus when needed?
    Yeah, as far as wins and losses I don't think he would have a different career. But I did say probably would've lost to Pac and PBF. Because against PBF I think we may have seen a close decision. Its difficult to predict. Were just guessing using what we know is good and bad. Hatton lost to 2 world beaters and I just don't think even the best Ricky Hatton would've beat either one of them because you still have to correct his glaring technical flaws. Had Hatton had another notch to step up we may have seen PBF step it up one or two more also. You have to push PBF to see his best he doesn't push the envelope himself very well anymore. Though the PBF fight would've been more interesting.
    Last edited by blegit; 12-07-2009 at 11:23 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-10-2008, 05:15 AM
  2. Hatton v Castillo - The Drunken Weight by Weight.
    By superheavyrhun in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-23-2007, 01:25 AM
  3. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 04-13-2007, 12:35 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 10:49 PM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-12-2006, 08:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing