Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
Quote Originally Posted by VanChilds View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post


You were taking the Apocalypse Now approach to combat.
You were criticising their methods and saying international law shouldnt really matter in cases where your opponent doesn't adhere to them.
There are only two conclusions to draw from that, you either stick to international law because you think it is right and proper to do so, hence superior. If you criticise your opponent for their behaviour what else are people to think?

I study military history. Perhaps US/UK leaders should do the same, they seem to have learnt nothing from Vietnam.


The point is this, you can not win against these people.
If their culture changes it will come from within and not by your or our direct meddling.
As I asked before who is "these people" again? And what do you mean by the Apcalyspe Now approach? My approach is that it shouldn't be up to someone with no skin in the game such as yourself to dictate how war should be fought. Let the commanders on the battlefield make these decisions. I'm not sure what you mean by criticize my opponent. Are you saying you support and endorse the tactics used by AQI/ShiaMilitias/Taliban?
They are fighting as they should perfectly.
Raid Uncovers al-Qaida Network of Child Suicide Bombers in Iraq | Iraq Updates

Female suicide bombings in Iraq: Why the recent surge? | csmonitor.com

Eastday-Wave of coordinated attacks in Iraq kills 127

Taliban gunmen shooting couple dead for adultery caught on camera - Telegraph

CNN.com - U.S. documents alleged Taliban atrocities - November 23, 2001

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Iraq Shias 'attack' Sunni mosques

"Perfectly"? Is Hitler your idea of a great father figure as well?