Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post

Sorry, Ice I'm totally with GB here. You use the natural weight argument against PBF's win at Hatton then totally disregard it saying ODLH beat a better version of Genaro Hernandez & Gatti, who were both well out of their natural weight far more obviously than Hatton.

You say ODLH was a part-time fighter, but PBF had fought only 5 times in the preceding 3 years. He was also outweighed by at least 15lbs probably more.

You criticize some of the opponents that GB has chosen, but you set the bar low by putting in guys like Oba Carr & David Kamau. Don't give me that solid contenders, they were horribly found out against anyone half decent. Hell, if you include them then why not Baldomir, Corley or Sharmba Mitchell.

Last point, fights aren't won on punch stats, they're won on rounds won. I thought Oscar's robbery defeat to Trinidad was more than evened out by his win against Sturm & I've long thought that the HBO commentators played up the ODLH-Mosley robbery angle. I thought Mosley did enough over the 2nd half of the fight to take it & actually you'll find most at ringside thought the same if you look into it. I can see Oscar winning, but not a robbery imo.
Hernandez fought damn near his whole career at 130. He moved up to 135 to fight Oscar. He was not well out his natural weight

And in his prime Oba Carr only lost to Oscar De La Hoya, Felix Trinidad and Ike Quartey. Them were more than half decent. Carr was a very good fighter. By the time he lost to Pineda he was already done
My point was that he was no more 'out of his weight' than Hatton was at 147. I disagree on Oba Carr, he lost to those guys but an old Frankie Randall aside who did he ever beat? No disgrace in losing to those guys, but he never looked above domestic level for me.

Quote Originally Posted by ICB
I'll just give some quick answers because im busy.

Genaro Hernandez was still fresher when he fought ODLH, so was Arturo Gatti.

ODLH was 2-2 when he fought Floyd Mayweather Jr, thats totally different circumstances to Floyd Mayweather Jr. Plus as i said 4 fights in 4 years its obvious he was a part time fighter at that point.

I never said there bad fighters i just said there nothing special, and i never said fighters like Carr, Kamau, were special. I just think overall ODLH has the better record.

I agree they don't tell the whole story in some cases, but in this case they do. ODLH dominated a majority of the rounds in both fights. Yes in both fights he allowed the fights to get closer because he lost the later rounds.

But mathematically how is it even possible either man got the win ? yes they may of not been outright robberies. But its robbery due to the fact that the worse ODLH could of done was a draw, and you would have to be being very generous to both fighters. Because there's no way either of them won 7 rounds.
To Ice's point, you can't justify Pacquiao's win over Hatton as better than PBF's because it was at 140 & THEN say that ODLH's wins over Genaro & Gatti were better because they were fresher. So because Oscar was 2-2, that somehow meant he was shot. As you pointed out defending him, one of those was against a bigger B-Hop & the other a 'robbery' against Shane Mosley. All I'm saying is as inactive as he'd been inthe previous 3 years, PBF had only been marginally more active. He also heavily outweighed him.

It's cool that you think Oscar has the better record bro, it's just others like me & GB think Floyd has the better record. Your post gets a little bit contradictory in the last paragraph, but I'll say this. The majority of those ringside for Mosley-Oscar II had Shane winning. Those watching on tv had Oscar winning. I personally thought when I watched it that Shane won 7-5, but wouldn't have argued either way. I can't remember my scorecard, but when I have time I'll rewatch & repost what I come up with. I agree there was no way you could have Trinidad winning the fight imo, but any fight where the scorecards are at all close is subjective, just because you see it one way doesn't mean that's how everyone sees it.