Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

    Bute's people are apparently in serious discussions to fight one of the Dirrell brothers. http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/1...ing-considered

    With Kessler, Pavlik, Froch, and Ward all out as opponents, Andre Dirrell (who I think beat Froch by 2-3 rounds) is definitely the best opponent out there, though he'll need a tune-up first. If that happens, then it would seem that they couldn't make the fight until a time that the Super Six winner would be available anyway.

    I guess he could fight Anthony Dirrell sooner (no need for a tune-up) but I'm way less interested in seeing that.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Bute's people are apparently in serious discussions to fight one of the Dirrell brothers. Bute versus one of the Dirrell brothers being considered | RingTV

    With Kessler, Pavlik, Froch, and Ward all out as opponents, Andre Dirrell (who I think beat Froch by 2-3 rounds) is definitely the best opponent out there, though he'll need a tune-up first. If that happens, then it would seem that they couldn't make the fight until a time that the Super Six winner would be available anyway.

    I guess he could fight Anthony Dirrell sooner (no need for a tune-up) but I'm way less interested in seeing that.
    Yea, I mean I just don't know the other options that are available. After the four you mentioned, Quillen opted to stay at 160, Pirog is MIA, basically there is Glen Johnson, Anthony Dirrell, and that's it. I can't really think of anyone else. Bilbo likes Groves, but I doubt Groves' people put him in there with Bute now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    758
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Bute's people are apparently in serious discussions to fight one of the Dirrell brothers. Bute versus one of the Dirrell brothers being considered | RingTV

    With Kessler, Pavlik, Froch, and Ward all out as opponents, Andre Dirrell (who I think beat Froch by 2-3 rounds) is definitely the best opponent out there, though he'll need a tune-up first. If that happens, then it would seem that they couldn't make the fight until a time that the Super Six winner would be available anyway.

    I guess he could fight Anthony Dirrell sooner (no need for a tune-up) but I'm way less interested in seeing that.
    Yea, I mean I just don't know the other options that are available. After the four you mentioned, Quillen opted to stay at 160, Pirog is MIA, basically there is Glen Johnson, Anthony Dirrell, and that's it. I can't really think of anyone else. Bilbo likes Groves, but I doubt Groves' people put him in there with Bute now.


    Bute should go up to 175 for a big fight.

    He turned pro in 2003, and during 2003, 2004, and his first fight during 2005, he weighed between 170 and 175. It appeared to me when I noticed it on boxrec a while ago that he was a LH who likely moved down when his team figured out he would be bigger than most of the good fighters at 168.

    I think that he should have gone up to 175 for a fight instead of treading water as he fought B/C level competition over the last few years (while just waiting for the super 6 winner).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

    Quote Originally Posted by captainanddew View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Bute's people are apparently in serious discussions to fight one of the Dirrell brothers. Bute versus one of the Dirrell brothers being considered | RingTV

    With Kessler, Pavlik, Froch, and Ward all out as opponents, Andre Dirrell (who I think beat Froch by 2-3 rounds) is definitely the best opponent out there, though he'll need a tune-up first. If that happens, then it would seem that they couldn't make the fight until a time that the Super Six winner would be available anyway.

    I guess he could fight Anthony Dirrell sooner (no need for a tune-up) but I'm way less interested in seeing that.
    Yea, I mean I just don't know the other options that are available. After the four you mentioned, Quillen opted to stay at 160, Pirog is MIA, basically there is Glen Johnson, Anthony Dirrell, and that's it. I can't really think of anyone else. Bilbo likes Groves, but I doubt Groves' people put him in there with Bute now.


    Bute should go up to 175 for a big fight.

    He turned pro in 2003, and during 2003, 2004, and his first fight during 2005, he weighed between 170 and 175. It appeared to me when I noticed it on boxrec a while ago that he was a LH who likely moved down when his team figured out he would be bigger than most of the good fighters at 168.

    I think that he should have gone up to 175 for a fight instead of treading water as he fought B/C level competition over the last few years (while just waiting for the super 6 winner).
    You nver know what will happen, but here they are saying Tavoris Cloud.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    158
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    767
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

    I would love to see Cloud versus Bute! That would be an all action fight. I know Cloud is with Don King, which is never a good thing but that fight makes a lot of sense for both guys and is much more compelling than BHop-Dawson, Pascal-Bute, Bute-Johnson. I agree that neither Pirog nor Quillen wants to fight a big super middle.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Since Pavlik isn't fighting Bute - what do you guys think of Quillin or Pirog?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gocougars3 View Post
    I would love to see Cloud versus Bute! That would be an all action fight. I know Cloud is with Don King, which is never a good thing but that fight makes a lot of sense for both guys and is much more compelling than BHop-Dawson, Pascal-Bute, Bute-Johnson. I agree that neither Pirog nor Quillen wants to fight a big super middle.
    Just after I posted that I heard he was sticking to 168 and isn't ready to move up. I want to see him versus Froch. That would be a scrap.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Bute v. Pavlik
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-26-2011, 07:15 PM
  2. Pavlik - Martinez/Bute - Miranda fight talk
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 04-19-2010, 07:05 PM
  3. Pavlik vs Bute
    By gest12645 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-02-2009, 08:32 PM
  4. Wednesday Night Fights: Echols - Quillin
    By amat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 04-18-2008, 12:28 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 10:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing