Amir khan: mayweather ducking me

[Gandalf]

It does not make sense for Amir Khan to fight Prescott at this point in their career. While Khan went on a winning streak since his loss, Prescott went on to lose 3 out of his 7 fights, the most recent was just a few days ago. Khan is not going to gain much from this fight. If he beats Prescott, they might just say that Breidis is on a career slide anyway.

The bout would have been great if they did the rematch within a year of their fight but there was no interest in an immediate rematch then since Khan was totally annihilated in their fight. If Khan do decide to fight Prescott, then he should be commended, if not, no big deal. There are a number of boxing greats who never avenged their loss.

And I have accused Mayweather of ducking but Khan would not be one of them.

Like duh, it makes no sense for a fighter to avenge a loss? Of course it bloody does and more so in the past. Khan will always have that hole in his record and it serves him right for never trying to make amends. It really irritates me when people defend blatant ducking.

Utter tosh.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

It does not make sense for Amir Khan to fight Prescott at this point in their career. While Khan went on a winning streak since his loss, Prescott went on to lose 3 out of his 7 fights, the most recent was just a few days ago. Khan is not going to gain much from this fight. If he beats Prescott, they might just say that Breidis is on a career slide anyway.

The bout would have been great if they did the rematch within a year of their fight but there was no interest in an immediate rematch then since Khan was totally annihilated in their fight. If Khan do decide to fight Prescott, then he should be commended, if not, no big deal. There are a number of boxing greats who never avenged their loss.

And I have accused Mayweather of ducking but Khan would not be one of them.

Like duh, it makes no sense for a fighter to avenge a loss? Of course it bloody does and more so in the past. Khan will always have that hole in his record and it serves him right for never trying to make amends. It really irritates me when people defend blatant ducking.

Utter tosh.

So, what can you say about Juan Manuel Marquez not avenging his loss against Chris John? Is that blatant ducking?

[Gandalf]

It does not make sense for Amir Khan to fight Prescott at this point in their career. While Khan went on a winning streak since his loss, Prescott went on to lose 3 out of his 7 fights, the most recent was just a few days ago. Khan is not going to gain much from this fight. If he beats Prescott, they might just say that Breidis is on a career slide anyway.

The bout would have been great if they did the rematch within a year of their fight but there was no interest in an immediate rematch then since Khan was totally annihilated in their fight. If Khan do decide to fight Prescott, then he should be commended, if not, no big deal. There are a number of boxing greats who never avenged their loss.

And I have accused Mayweather of ducking but Khan would not be one of them.

Like duh, it makes no sense for a fighter to avenge a loss? Of course it bloody does and more so in the past. Khan will always have that hole in his record and it serves him right for never trying to make amends. It really irritates me when people defend blatant ducking.

Utter tosh.

So, what can you say about Juan Manuel Marquez not avenging his loss against Chris John? Is that blatant ducking?

Well, he arguably won that fight. Khan in no way came near to beating Prescott.

Your argument is utter tosh.

[SRR]

Mayweather's ducking me too

[InTheNeutralCorner]

It does not make sense for Amir Khan to fight Prescott at this point in their career. While Khan went on a winning streak since his loss, Prescott went on to lose 3 out of his 7 fights, the most recent was just a few days ago. Khan is not going to gain much from this fight. If he beats Prescott, they might just say that Breidis is on a career slide anyway.

The bout would have been great if they did the rematch within a year of their fight but there was no interest in an immediate rematch then since Khan was totally annihilated in their fight. If Khan do decide to fight Prescott, then he should be commended, if not, no big deal. There are a number of boxing greats who never avenged their loss.

And I have accused Mayweather of ducking but Khan would not be one of them.

Like duh, it makes no sense for a fighter to avenge a loss? Of course it bloody does and more so in the past. Khan will always have that hole in his record and it serves him right for never trying to make amends. It really irritates me when people defend blatant ducking.

Utter tosh.

So, what can you say about Juan Manuel Marquez not avenging his loss against Chris John? Is that blatant ducking?

Well, he arguably won that fight. Khan in no way came near to beating Prescott.

Your argument is utter tosh.

Arguably but the record books say that JMM loss by a unanimous decision. And how can you be sure that it's 'arguably', did you see the fight? So to put that 'arguably' to rest, shouldn't JMM have tried to avenge his loss or is he blatantly ducking?

Your counter argument is totally rubbish.

[Gandalf]

It does not make sense for Amir Khan to fight Prescott at this point in their career. While Khan went on a winning streak since his loss, Prescott went on to lose 3 out of his 7 fights, the most recent was just a few days ago. Khan is not going to gain much from this fight. If he beats Prescott, they might just say that Breidis is on a career slide anyway.

The bout would have been great if they did the rematch within a year of their fight but there was no interest in an immediate rematch then since Khan was totally annihilated in their fight. If Khan do decide to fight Prescott, then he should be commended, if not, no big deal. There are a number of boxing greats who never avenged their loss.

And I have accused Mayweather of ducking but Khan would not be one of them.

Like duh, it makes no sense for a fighter to avenge a loss? Of course it bloody does and more so in the past. Khan will always have that hole in his record and it serves him right for never trying to make amends. It really irritates me when people defend blatant ducking.

Utter tosh.

So, what can you say about Juan Manuel Marquez not avenging his loss against Chris John? Is that blatant ducking?

Well, he arguably won that fight. Khan in no way came near to beating Prescott.

Your argument is utter tosh.

Arguably but the record books say that JMM loss by a unanimous decision. And how can you be sure that it's 'arguably', did you see the fight? So to put that 'arguably' to rest, shouldn't JMM have tried to avenge his loss or is he blatantly ducking?

Your counter argument is totally rubbish.

Of course I have seen it, it's on You Tube where everything else in the world can be found. It is a close fight, but Marquez did enough and points were taken away far too easily. Just as with the Manny fights Marquez has a very solid case. Khan on the other hand has no case and so should have tried to atone for his awful showing. The official records are full of holes and dodgy decisions, why should you need to make amends for being ripped off by dodgy officiating? Now being stopped in a minute is a different story. Lewis did it, Mosley tried to do it as did Barrera and yet you have fighters like Khan who run a mile. There is nothing wrong with taking a loss, but a fighter cannot call themselves the best if they fail to at least try and correct a devastating loss. That earns a lot more respect than pretending it never even happened.

My argument is stupendously sublime and yours is utter hogwash and poppycock. Now be gone with you, you naive and silly little child. Before I spank you on my knee and throw darts into my Manny Pacquiao poster.

[Ant Live]

NOT WORTH THE READ!!!

The only thing I'm getting from these fighters that's saying they want to fight Floyd, is that they are not giving Ortiz a chance. That goes for Khan, Pacman and Alvarez. IMO, they are also saying, fighting and beating Floyd will mean more then fighting and beating Pacman(since Pacman is consider as #1 P4P). Whether fighting and defeating Floyd is going to get more money or a HOF ballet. Either or, all these fighters that's calling Floyd out, just win your upcoming fight impressively.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Of course I have seen it, it's on You Tube where everything else in the world can be found. It is a close fight, but Marquez did enough and points were taken away far too easily. Just as with the Manny fights Marquez has a very solid case. Khan on the other hand has no case and so should have tried to atone for his awful showing. The official records are full of holes and dodgy decisions, why should you need to make amends for being ripped off by dodgy officiating? Now being stopped in a minute is a different story. Lewis did it, Mosley tried to do it as did Barrera and yet you have fighters like Khan who run a mile. There is nothing wrong with taking a loss, but a fighter cannot call themselves the best if they fail to at least try and correct a devastating loss. That earns a lot more respect than pretending it never even happened.

My argument is stupendously sublime and yours is utter hogwash and poppycock. Now be gone with you, you naive and silly little child. Before I spank you on my knee and throw darts into my Manny Pacquiao poster.

Your initial contention has to do with avenging a loss, you didn't mention that they only have to avenge a devastating loss.

Would you consider Sergio Martinez loss by 7th round TKO to Antonio Margarito as a devastating loss? So, is Martinez blatantly ducking Margarito for not avenging that loss? Does this mean that he didn't earn your respect for pretending that it never even happened?

And what's this obsession you have with cock? Don't you have ............... never mind.

[THE THIRD MAN]

Well if that is the case Amir, how about firing in a challenge to the Pacman? That fight would keep us occupied for about 5 minutes!

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Of course I have seen it, it's on You Tube where everything else in the world can be found. It is a close fight, but Marquez did enough and points were taken away far too easily. Just as with the Manny fights Marquez has a very solid case. Khan on the other hand has no case and so should have tried to atone for his awful showing. The official records are full of holes and dodgy decisions, why should you need to make amends for being ripped off by dodgy officiating? Now being stopped in a minute is a different story. Lewis did it, Mosley tried to do it as did Barrera and yet you have fighters like Khan who run a mile. There is nothing wrong with taking a loss, but a fighter cannot call themselves the best if they fail to at least try and correct a devastating loss. That earns a lot more respect than pretending it never even happened.

My argument is stupendously sublime and yours is utter hogwash and poppycock. Now be gone with you, you naive and silly little child. Before I spank you on my knee and throw darts into my Manny Pacquiao poster.

Your initial contention has to do with avenging a loss, you didn't mention that they only have to avenge a devastating loss.

Would you consider Sergio Martinez loss by 7th round TKO to Antonio Margarito as a devastating loss? So, is Martinez blatantly ducking Margarito for not avenging the loss? Does this mean that he didn't earn your respect for not correcting that loss?

And what's this obsession you have with cock? Don't you have ............... never mind.

[Master]

Cannot criticise Khan, the sun headline is just trying to just do that and grab the headlines. Khan is trying to take on anyone and everyone legitimately able to challenge him. I would prefer for Khan to stay at light welter and beat Bradley and be rightly regarded as the best at the weight. I am also glad Morales does not want to fight him.

[Gandalf]

Of course I have seen it, it's on You Tube where everything else in the world can be found. It is a close fight, but Marquez did enough and points were taken away far too easily. Just as with the Manny fights Marquez has a very solid case. Khan on the other hand has no case and so should have tried to atone for his awful showing. The official records are full of holes and dodgy decisions, why should you need to make amends for being ripped off by dodgy officiating? Now being stopped in a minute is a different story. Lewis did it, Mosley tried to do it as did Barrera and yet you have fighters like Khan who run a mile. There is nothing wrong with taking a loss, but a fighter cannot call themselves the best if they fail to at least try and correct a devastating loss. That earns a lot more respect than pretending it never even happened.

My argument is stupendously sublime and yours is utter hogwash and poppycock. Now be gone with you, you naive and silly little child. Before I spank you on my knee and throw darts into my Manny Pacquiao poster.

Your initial contention has to do with avenging a loss, you didn't mention that they only have to avenge a devastating loss.

Would you consider Sergio Martinez loss by 7th round TKO to Antonio Margarito as a devastating loss? So, is Martinez blatantly ducking Margarito for not avenging the loss? Does this mean that he didn't earn your respect for not correcting that loss?

And what's this obsession you have with cock? Don't you have ............... never mind.

Martinez should rematch and destroy Margarito. Obviously.

There is a rooster that wakes me up a 4am every morning. However, you are a different kind of cock and probably dream of inserting your tiny one into Manny Pac night after night. I wish you luck in your romantic pursuit.

[imp]

Manny wont fight amir.
Manny only fights fighters coming off losses. Amir is too much of a risk for him.

[shza]

So, what can you say about Juan Manuel Marquez not avenging his loss against Chris John? Is that blatant ducking?

YES! Seriously, it's ridiculous JMM got such a free pass on that.

[Kev]

Khan is saying all the right things. Right now I see him as the best option realistically for Floyd.

Let's look at the options.

Manny, of course the fight we all want.Floyd does not seem to want this at all, at least not yet.

Martinez, Probably the toughest opponent out there would be Martinez at 154. Highly doubt Floyd would ever consider taking that fight.


After that.............


There is ONLY Khan. Who else has as big a profile and could generate as much money as Mayweather vs Khan outside of the above two?

Bradley and Berto don't bring anything. Cotto is no longer a draw and Chazez Jr and Alvarez couldn't be sold as credible opponents.


If Floyd keeps on fighting it's hard to see how he can avoid Khan if he refuses to fight Manny and Martinez.

Khan needs to keep hounding him, make that fight happen.

I actually think he has a live chance, and he will certainly give it a good go early.