Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    603
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Quote Originally Posted by Snakey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Hopkins has done this far too often for me to have any sympathy. He has tried to cheat and screw fighters so many times and then gets upset when finally it has gone against him. If they want a rematch in 3 months, then let's have it because I am convinced it will be the last we see of BHop. He can't fight 12 rounds with Dawson.

    Let's not forget why Hopkins was on his back, it was because once again he tried to man grope Chad Dawson and clinging yourself to an opponent like an octopus is not an acceptable move either. Should a fighter just allow themselves to be hugged non-stop? No, you push your opponent off and try to force a fight. Dawson was doing just that. Hopkins seems to be made of bone china with his crying in every fight. Toney falls out the ring, he gets up and the man was so big against Oquendo that it defied the laws of physics. But Hopkins falls, seems to take most of the fall on his back and lo and behold he is injured. Now where have we seen Hopkins crying on the canvas before?

    The ref saw it as a spoiler hugging and getting pushed away, it's a shame that Hopkins apparently hurt himself in the process, but at the same time he should have insisted that the fight go on. He looked like he wanted out and got it.
    Miles your one of my favorite posters on here by far, but COME ON !

    The ref fucked it up, and Dawson should not be proud of his "win".

    I saw the first round for Hopkins, and the second was going Chad's way, but at no point was Bernard getting hurt, beat up, rocked, or dominated.

    He may have milked the injury a bit, I don't know, but he was fouled, illegally picked up and slammed to the mat, and suffered an injury as a result.

    Thats a DQ. Or a the least a No Contest.
    But a foul was never called and Hopkins didn't appear to be saying 'let me fight'. He was looking for the way out and the ref gave it to him.

    I agree that the referee was flustered and didn't seem to be entirely in control, at the least I think Hopkins should have been clearly awarded 5 minutes to recuperate and that the ref should have considered the situation with a clearer head. But as it stands it wasn't called a foul and personally speaking I don't think you can blame a fighter for pushing a Ruiz type fighter off of you. Hugging and holding is one of my bugbears and Hopkins doesn't get a pass because he is old.

    I thought Dawson edged a close first round and was winning the second. I saw little in Hopkins to suggest he was in any way a serious threat.
    So based on the two rounds you know how that fight was going...well a round and a half really? Damn based on that..Kostya Tszyu clearly wasnt going to beat Zab Judah.
    We all saw Bernard come from behind to dominate Pascal on the rematch.. To try to even guess the outcome of that fight is idiotic. Amazingly Hopkins was doing well in the first few rounds and I say this because he usually gives them away to dominate the half and latter rounds like he did Pascal. So i felt Hopkins was doing well but no one can judge what was going to happen.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    603
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Well Miles looks like B-Hop wasn't faking the injury. At the end of the day it seems to be that people kind of somehow justify what happen yesterday night by saying "well Hopkins is a dirty fighter and had it coming". But fair is fair and what happened yesterday should at the very least be overturned to a no contest. This is boxing not wrestling or the ufc. To let a win like this occur would be a huge black eye on the sport we love. This is not about our personal likes or dislikes with the fighters. This is about what's right and and justice. NC, immediate rematch it's fair to both parties.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3186
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    to say Hopkins deserved that is plain stupid.

    Its been a few years but I could have sworn Miles was a Hatton fan? I thought he was maybe I'm wrong but to hear him say Hopkins the spoiler and octopus cracks me up since Hatton made a living that style.

    Tko loss is not even a possibility within the boxing rules. No punches were thrown, and anyone who says Hopkins was bumming him is just an idiot. You see that sequence in Boxing all the time when fighters come together. Dawson CLEARLY and you knobs can't dispute the footage... Clearly took his left hand/glove and scooped the backside of Hopkins left knee like a wrestling takedown and shrugged him off. It was illegal!!! Now I have no problem with it.. What I have the problem with is the incompetent Ref who wrote his own rules. His job is to protect the fighters and officiate the Boxing rules. His judgement call has to be made within the guidelines. It CLEARLY wasn't it!

    The injury was sustained from a non boxing move so a TKO isint even a possibility.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,312
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5156
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    to say Hopkins deserved that is plain stupid.

    Its been a few years but I could have sworn Miles was a Hatton fan? I thought he was maybe I'm wrong but to hear him say Hopkins the spoiler and octopus cracks me up since Hatton made a living that style.

    Tko loss is not even a possibility within the boxing rules. No punches were thrown, and anyone who says Hopkins was bumming him is just an idiot. You see that sequence in Boxing all the time when fighters come together. Dawson CLEARLY and you knobs can't dispute the footage... Clearly took his left hand/glove and scooped the backside of Hopkins left knee like a wrestling takedown and shrugged him off. It was illegal!!! Now I have no problem with it.. What I have the problem with is the incompetent Ref who wrote his own rules. His job is to protect the fighters and officiate the Boxing rules. His judgement call has to be made within the guidelines. It CLEARLY wasn't it!

    The injury was sustained from a non boxing move so a TKO isint even a possibility.
    Spot on. The level of bias never ceases to amaze. No professional fighter deserves to "lose" like that and we need to expect more and not settle on horse shit like that no matter how much of an asshole we think a guy is. Today its a Bernard, tomorrow its your guy. The ref doesn't get to make it up on the fly. Trifling shit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Piye I tolerate some things, but I will not tolerate being called a racist without any evidence being put forth to suggest as much. I'm afraid criticizing the improper usage of English by Haye just doesn't cut it as I would argue that a significant proportion of British people have poor verbal skills. However, that is not an issue of race.

    Say any more silly crap like that again and I will have you reported to a Mod as I don't think it is acceptable to randomly tar people with the racist card. It is wrong to be racist and at the same time wrong to falsely accuse people. You can't cry rape just for a kick and likewise you can't just play the race card.

    It is cheap and the act of a lowlife.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1090
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Piye I tolerate some things, but I will not tolerate being called a racist without any evidence being put forth to suggest as much. I'm afraid criticizing the improper usage of English by Haye just doesn't cut it as I would argue that a significant proportion of British people have poor verbal skills. However, that is not an issue of race.

    Say any more silly crap like that again and I will have you reported to a Mod as I don't think it is acceptable to randomly tar people with the racist card. It is wrong to be racist and at the same time wrong to falsely accuse people. You can't cry rape just for a kick and likewise you can't just play the race card.

    It is cheap and the act of a lowlife.
    Report me go ahead, I will not be afraid to say my opinion for fear of consequences I am not braking any of the sites rules and I am entitled to my opinion. So go ahead report me but first stop forcing your ignorant elitist attitude down the throat of forum readers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3186
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Piye I tolerate some things, but I will not tolerate being called a racist without any evidence being put forth to suggest as much. I'm afraid criticizing the improper usage of English by Haye just doesn't cut it as I would argue that a significant proportion of British people have poor verbal skills. However, that is not an issue of race.

    Say any more silly crap like that again and I will have you reported to a Mod as I don't think it is acceptable to randomly tar people with the racist card. It is wrong to be racist and at the same time wrong to falsely accuse people. You can't cry rape just for a kick and likewise you can't just play the race card.

    It is cheap and the act of a lowlife.
    My past 2 years around here I been on the down low, but I have know you on the forum for 5 years and don't remember you being a racist.

    However you have seemed to be an articulate, passive windup artist at times

    Your opinion goes both ways quite a bit as long as it suits your fancy and always leaves a mouse hole size exit door for you to squeeze out of if need to be. It is quite a skill set

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins vs Dawson NO FOUL?!

    Most people have some racist in them. Some are just more upfront about it while some are indirect..

    IM not even talking about Miles either.. Just people in general.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Hopkins-Dawson in negotiations for showdown
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 07:10 PM
  2. How about Hopkins Vs. Dawson
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 10:20 PM
  3. When is Dawson-Hopkins going to happen? :(
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 09:55 PM
  4. Replies: 56
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 07:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing