Hopkins v Dawson

[Rantcatrat]

At this stage most of Hopkins' appeal is that he is a 47 year old man competing with young prime boxers. It's not that his style is exciting because it isn't.

[Master]

B Hop was in the fight but I had him losing the first round. I think Dawson was fully motivated to win the fight. B Hop would have landed some meaningful right hands over the course of the fight but would eventually have lost the decision. Dawson was desperate to win this fight.

[FinitoElDinamita]

B Hop was in the fight but I had him losing the first round. I think Dawson was fully motivated to win the fight. B Hop would have landed some meaningful right hands over the course of the fight but would eventually have lost the decision. Dawson was desperate to win this fight.

This.

[Dia bando]

When i go to a fight i want to see a FIGHT same with ppv, but with Hopkins you dont get that?his fight's are CRAP so when you or i give good money to go into his pocket i see MY

[Doot]

sounds like you guys would be better UFC fans than boxing fans.

[Dia bando]

NO THANK''S it a bit

[JT Rock]

I don't think anyone has ever accused Hopkins of being an exciting fighter.

With him it's the promotion and a guy who respects his body enough to keep it in prime working shape competing at the highest level at 47 years old.

Dawson is a stinker himself, a tactical fighter with 0 killer instinct and frequently loses focus. It's no secret that I'm a huge Floyd fan but he gets accused of the old reverse reverse. But he has a 2nd gear and a killer instinct and is all business unlike Dawson.

The guy is from my state and 15min away from my town in Hartford CT, but I cant route for a guy that is as passive as him . Against Pascal he had ample Opportunity to get Pascal out of there but he screwed about took his foot off the gas and gaffed a chance to KO Pascal in Canada raising his stock.. Instead a headbutt and loses his title

He has 1000000% himself to blame and he aint getting anymore exciting