Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 45

Thread: When Bernard gets his belt back should he give Dawson a rematch ?

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: When Bernard gets his belt back should he give Dawson a rematch ?

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post

    I had Dawson winning the first and second rounds up until the body slam and I thought either way you had the rounds, it appeared Bernard was going to have problems with Dawson's speed and size. Dawson looked a good amount bigger than Bernard in there. Certainly, there is no way to know and in fact you saw something different.

    What I thought I saw was Bernard leaning over Chad in a somewhat dirty fashion to put his weight on Chad and Chad then nudging him off. Then to buy more time Bernard wouldn't get up (which would be par for the course for Bernard fights). My question is: since it was only the 2nd round, and they could stop it before the 4th on the body slam, why didn't Bernard just get up and fight on and see how his shoulder felt after a round or two? Why did he say he wouldn't continue? I think what he actually said was something like "with one arm" as if to say no I can't.
    the ref asked him, Can you continue, the first thing out his mouth was yes

    and you can't have it both ways, how would Hopkins "putting his weight on Dawson" affect him at all if as you said Dawson seemed like the bigger fighter, Chad was simply frustrated with Hopkins defense and awkward style and was looking to vent so he slammed him then went on to make a bigger ass of himself parading around the ring like if he actually won the championship, to really break it down, the slam and Dawson's wannabe gangster act at the end of the fight is the only time that his ass has acted "Bad", the dude has a giant shit stain running across his record and his rep
    I think you can have it both ways. They both weighed in at 175+ for the fight and a 175 pound man leaning on you will have an effect over the course of the fight. I agree Dawson was intent on imposing his will on Hopkins and showing Hopkins that he wouldn't allow him to fight dirty. I believe that is why what happened, happened,

    Don't forget Hopkins didn't want the Dawson fight for a few years. There is no doubt about that. Many people at the time considered it a duck job. Dawson was calling out Hopkins and Hopkins wasn't answering.

    If the referree didn't allow him to continue the fight when he wanted to, then that is the ref's bad, not Dawson's.
    Last edited by Rantcatrat; 10-18-2011 at 02:34 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Bernard Hopkins v Chad Dawson
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-24-2011, 08:48 PM
  2. Chad Dawson vs Bernard Hopkins on PPV?
    By outspoken in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-12-2011, 05:22 PM
  3. McCall: I'll give Sam a rematch!“
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-17-2007, 02:44 PM
  4. Will Hatton REALLY give Collazo a rematch?
    By Mr. Nightmare in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-16-2006, 10:47 AM
  5. Hatton to give up IBF belt
    By timdalefan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 07:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing