Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
Quote Originally Posted by saltwaterjag View Post
Quote Originally Posted by blegit View Post
I'm sure some of the people who wanted Pac to win will play this out to be a close fight and understandable decision. I just want to know where the logical case is for Pac in this fight. The first 2 fights I always kept my mouth closed because they realistically could have went to either fighter so it gives the judges a lot of discretion. No robbery in those. But this fight JMM clearly outboxed Pac and had him whiffing and frustrated. Even Roach told Pac he was behind. Can even the biggest Pac boy agree/lie with Pac winning 8 rounds? Well, in the end we'll get our usual arguments and the people who saw Pac winning will keep their stance and while this time JMM really did get robbed and has a right to place one of those shirts on Pac, Roach, Arum, and the rest of the team. Tonight boxing proved it really is business before anything.
What? Manny Landed more punches and Power punches. Check Compubox sucka! To be the man you have to beat the man! Marquez didn't deserve to win.. He could have yes had he pressed the fight.. This was not one of Manny's bet showings but he still won.. Bring on D-Bag Gayweather!
Punchstats don't mean jack as i said Spinks landed more punches than Holmes, in there 2nd fight and thats considered a huge robbery. By going what i see with my own eyes JMM clearly won the fight.
So then why does everyone that says Marquez won the first two fights use stats as an argument that he won? The stats have meaning you just don't agree in this fight they do. Marquez lost this fight and it was was his weakest performance of the three. I was bored out of my mind the first 4 rounds.